It's Halloween.
So I'm pausing in my series of earnest posts about computer and online learning to reflect about something far more important--Frankenstein. I just googled for an image: got 65,000,000 choices. A lot to consider so soon after breakfast. The most famous one, of course, is the one from the James Whale film of Frankenstein (1931) with Boris Karloff in the title role. But as readers of Mary Shelley's original 1818 novel know: that image doesn't much resemble the creature she imagined in her book--that agile, intelligent, LARGE (eight feet tall!) fellow who just wanted some of what Aretha Franklin sang about (starts with an R).
As many of you know, I went through a long obsessive period about Frankenstein and its creator, a period lasting from, oh, 1994 to ... now? No, not now. It's cooled some. Though I am well into the writing of a memoir called Frankenstein Sundae about my decade(s?)-long pursuit of her and her story, a pursuit that took me to England, Wales, Switzerland (where she got the idea in 1816), Italy, Germany (site of Castle Frankenstein, which does not appear in the novel), and to a ga-jillion libraries and archives. I wrote a YA biography of Mary Shelley and published it via Amazon/Kindle (link to Amazon page). The cover of that book, by the way, shows one of the early stage portrayals of the creature.
A week or so ago, I bought a new annotated edition of the novel--and it's a wonder (Harvard Univ. Pr., 2012). Edited by two American scholars (Princeton, Rutgers ... hmmmm, a New Jersey connection?), the volume uses the 1818 version (there were two others in Mary's lifetime) and is lushly illustrated (often in color) and lovingly, accurately annotated. I like that the annotations lie in the margins, alongside the text, not banished to endnotes where only nerds like me go look. A good chronology. Some stuff about the movies. About the original composition of the novel. Wish I'd published the damn thing myself.
I thought you might like to read a draft of one part of one chapter about my earliest memories of the story ... from the aforementioned memoir-in-progress:
V:
Danny Meets Frankenstein
My earliest memory of the monster
…
I was born in 1944 in Enid,
Oklahoma, where my parents had met as students at Phillips University (now
defunct) and married in 1939. I cannot
remember the exact year—or even season—when the 1931 movie Frankenstein, the classic one directed by James Whale and featuring
Boris Karloff, appeared on television. Our
roof antenna brought in the only three stations it could—one from Enid (KGEO),
the others from Oklahoma City (WKY, KWTV).
But it must have been on a Saturday, or in the summer, because my two
brothers—one older, one younger—and I could not watch television on school
days, certainly not on Sunday, a day devoted to Sunday school and church (Disciples
of Christ) and a huge dinner (usually pot roast with carrots and peeled potatoes
that lay heating and hardening in the oven while we sang hymns and endured long
sermons in a hot sanctuary a few blocks away) and reading the Enid Morning News and snoozing before a
supper of leftovers and, sometimes, a return to church for vespers.
But I do remember this: Dad would not
let us watch Frankenstein. My older brother and I pressed for a
reason—respectfully, respectfully. In
the 1950s in our house there were no overt challenges to parental
authority. None. It was inconceivable. And even if we had thought about it, we would have concluded with quick certainty
that open defiance was suicidal. Not
that my father was abusive. He
wasn’t. But he was a large man—a former
high school and college football star—and when he spanked us (brisk swats on
our bottoms with the back of a hairbrush, rare but always well earned), we knew
we’d been spanked.
But about the movie, Dad told us
that he’d seen it when it was released back in 1931 (he was eighteen then), and
he said there was a really horrible scene in it. Tell
us! my brother and I cried, eager for horror. There’s
a scene, Dad said, when Frankenstein [yes,
he mixed up the monster and the creator, as people still do] comes across a little girl playing by the
water. Dad stopped, perhaps
considering the effects of what he was about to tell us. Daddy! What happens? He looked at us, made his decision. And
she’s pulling up flowers and tossing them in the lake. He looked at us again. And
then the monster grabs her and …
I don’t remember if he actually told
us that the creature dismembers the little girl, but he didn’t really have
to. I saw the image. I see it right now. Frankenstein’s monster plucking off the arms
and legs of a screaming little girl. Flinging
the gory things in the lake. The
creature perhaps a little puzzled about the screams. The pretty
flower didn’t make noise, he reasons.
Why is this pretty creature
making noises? Something along those
lines.
So … we saw no Frankenstein that day. Nor
did we see any other versions of the story that appeared on TV or at the local
movie houses of our boyhoods—the Cherokee, Chief, Esquire, and Sooner. The only exception—Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1948). When I saw that comedy years later, I
realized I’d seen it before … but when?
And, of course, I later saw that
1931 film, too. And when the creature
finds the little girl alongside the water, I knew what was going to happen.
I steeled myself.
But, of course, it doesn’t happen.
Here’s what we see instead—check it
on YouTube. The creature—who’s already
killed two people—is charmed by the floating flowers, the daisies the little
girl (Maria) has uprooted and tossed into the lake. He smiles.
Tosses some that she has given him.
Then he runs out of blossoms. Pauses. Then picks up little Maria (cradling her,
holding her like a parent). He throws her
in the water, where she flails around. Then
we see bubbles. And a confused creature
leaving the scene. And, later, a grieving
father carrying the wet body of his dead daughter. (She’s missing no limbs.) Later, I read that Whale had actually filmed
the creature hurling her violently in—but censors (and Karloff himself) didn’t
like that, so out it went. Some local
censors cut the entire scene.
But there never was any
dismemberment.
Did my father misremember?
Or was he just trying to shock his
two little boys (we were probably, oh, 8 and 11) into dropping their suit to
see the film? If so, his tactic had the
opposite effect.
No comments:
Post a Comment