Dawn Reader

Dawn Reader
from Open Door Coffee Co.; Hudson, OH; Oct. 26, 2016

Sunday, March 11, 2018

Mom: 1919-2018

Mom's high-school yearbook picture,
senior year, 1936,
Richmond, VA
And so begin my days without a mother. For seventy-three years and four months she was always there; she seemed immortal, burying her grandparents, aunts, uncles, parents, brother (her only sibling), husband, and virtually all of her friends.

But, of course, she wasn't. Immortal. She died yesterday morning in a nursing home in Lenox, Mass., part of the stages-of-care place where she's been living for the past dozen years or so. She went through them all: independent living, assisted living, nursing. The caretakers loved her all the way along--and why not? She was a gentle, uncomplaining soul. Gave none of them grief. Always expressed gratitude for their help.

She had been, said the hospice nurse, "responsive" the night before. But in the morning she was not. Breathing slowly, then irregularly, then nothing. A sigh and that was all.

I'll probably be writing about her off and on for a while--just so much to say. But for today I just wanted to talk about how strange it is, not having parents. The folks who knew all your stories (and often told them at the damnedest times!).

Something that's doubly strange about today for me: I always wrote to Mom on Sunday morning. Well ... "always" is not exactly accurate. Earlier in my adult, away-from-home life I would call them. Then--Mom got into email (she was the first in the family with a computer--an old Apple), and I communicated with her (besides the phone calls) via AOL for years.

Then, gradually, she lost the ability to use that laptop, though she resolutely left it in prominent view in her place--just to let folks know it was hers. My nephew, Ricky (bless him), used to update it whenever he visited--which was fairly often since he and his family (my younger brother's family) live in the Boston area.

During the final phases of her ability to use it, she would sometimes, full of frustration, call me and try to get me to help--which is hard to do when you can't see the screen. One time when I was there I took some pictures of her computer and keyboard and made a little illustrated booklet for her. But soon she couldn't handle that, either. And the email days ended.

So ... late in 2010 I started writing her snail-mail--Wednesday and Sunday. Calling a few times a week.

And then, only months ago, the calling became pointless. She couldn't answer the phone--was completely uncertain, really, what a phone even is. Sometimes, when my brothers were there, they would put one of their phones up to her ear and mouth. But Mom just seemed puzzled, barely muttering.

But, you know, hearing those mutters and mumblings were the sounds of Mozart to me.

Because she could no longer read my letters, my brothers or her attendants would read them to her. I wrote my last one on the past Wednesday and have no idea if it arrived--or if she could have understood any of it.

On Sunday evenings, after supper, Joyce and I would drive off on an errand (a coffee, a Diet Coke, a whatever), mailing Mom's letter along the way somewhere ... so what about this evening? It will be surpassingly strange ...

Here's one more sad thing. Mom was a great reader. Always reading, every spare moment (not that there were a lot of those with three jerky sons to take care of). On through her career, on through her retirement, on into her years in stages-of-care: read, read, read, read.

My brothers and I would feed her books like snack food. And then ... that stopped, too. Was it her eyesight? Her ability to focus? To remember? Probably all of the above. But--as she did with her laptop--she kept her final book on the stand right beside her chair. Bookmarked. Ready.

I am in some ways relieved that she no longer has to live in the way age had forced her to: She could do none of the things she really loved--reading, watching the news, going for hikes, swimming, talking on the phone with friends and family, driving to the store to buy some chocolate frozen yogurt and fresh salmon (her favorites!) ... you know ...

My brothers and I would bring her chocolate, right to the end. One of her final pleasures.

Nothing really makes any of this easier.

Last night, our son and his family came up for the evening. Just to be with us. We looked at Mom's old 1936 high school yearbook; we looked at the baby book she put together for me in my infancy--including the little letter that she wrote to me in the book (at the bottom of this post). We told stories. Remembered things.

Then, just before they left, grandson Logan (13) and I mixed up the sourdough starter that I would use for today's baking. Logan's interested in the whole thing--had questions about how the whole thing works. I did my best to answer them.

My starter will turn 33 years old this summer. If I keep treating it well, it will live and live and live and live.





Mom almost 80, 1999, our house in Hudson;
in town for our son's wedding



Friday, March 9, 2018

My Dad's 105th Birthday

1966
Hiram College Commencement
Dad was 53
I've blogged about my dad before--Charles Edward Dyer (1913-1999). He disliked the "Charles," always went by "Edward" or "Ed." His formal signature: "C. Edward Dyer." I'm not sure what that was all about--that Charles-aversion--but it was there, and it lasted all the fifty-five years I knew him.

I didn't know him right away--and not just because infants don't really know much except sleep-cry-suck. When I was born in November, 1944, Dad was still overseas with the U. S. Army. World War II. Dad was a chaplain and served in both theaters of the war--the Pacific, the Atlantic. Afterward, he stayed in the  military reserves, transferring to the Air Force (which separated from the Army in 1947). He would retire as a lieutenant colonel, and he was so proud of his military service that he made sure it was on his gravestone in Becket, Mass. Oh, and my mom, now 98 years old, still receives Dad's pension.


Dad was born on a farm in north-central Oregon, near Milton-Freewater, one of nearly a dozen children (he was the second oldest). His own father died when Dad was a teen; the Great Depression cost the family the farm. And off he went to school and work and work and work and work.

He went to the University of Oregon, then moved toward the ministry and became an ordained Disciples of Christ minister. In a graduate program at Phillips University in Enid, Oklahoma, he met my mom, Prudence Osborn, daughter of a distinguished professor there, G. Edwin Osborn (he didn't like the "George" part of his name!). They were married on October 12, 1939, headed off to Denver to begin his life as a minister.

And then ... the war.

When he came home (my older brother, Richard, who was about 4 when the war ended, asked Mom who that man was, the one in her bed!), Dad decided to shift his focus to teacher education, got his Ed.D. at the University of Oklahoma in the 1950s and was on the faculty of Phillips University (the provost, too) when he got an offer to teach at Hiram College--to be the head the Division of Education. And so off we went in the later summer of 1956.

Dad would continue preaching, though--filling in here and there. I have a recording of him, an old 78 rpm record, an Easter sermon at Amarillo Air Force Base, where we spent nearly two years in the early 1950s when Dad was called back to active duty because of the Korean War.

I could write forever about Dad. Such a wonderful man. A superior athlete, an amazing tenor voice. We have some recordings, one of which, "The Lord's Prayer," our son played during his own wedding in 1999. Dad then was near his death--too ill to come to the service. But his eyes got red and wet when he heard what our son was going to do.

He was mellow-tempered as well--and during my adolescence I gave him ample opportunities to "lose it"; he didn't.

He supported all three of his very different sons--different from one another, different from the world in some fundamental ways.

He supported Mom, encouraging her to go back to get her own Ph.D., picking up the slack at home while she was away.

His decline was a slow one, painful to watch: cane, walker, wheelchair, bed. It took years. But he somehow retained a startling equanimity that I simply do not possess.

He died only about six weeks after his sixtieth wedding anniversary. His funeral service--in Pittsfield, Mass.--featured something I've never seen: all of his sons spoke--as did others in the family (including Joyce). I cried as I'd never cried before.

Below, I've pasted the remarks I made that day ... and, oh, I scattered some of his ashes at the farm where he grew up--still a farm. And while I was there that day, with his younger brother John, no sooner had we scattered them than the sprinkler system kicked on, and both Uncle John and I got wet.

Dad would have laughed until tears drained from his eyes.

**





For
CHARLES EDWARD DYER,
my father,
9 March 1913 - 29 November 1999

            Astronomers tell us that every atom in our bodies was once part of a star.  Who better to illustrate that notion than my father, Charles Edward Dyer?
            When I was born on November 11, 1944, Dad was in Europe with the U. S. Army.  It took a while for his mail to catch up with him, so the letter announcing my birth did not reach him until December 2, when I was three weeks old.  But when it finally did, he sat down and wrote me this V-Mail:


            Dear Danny:                                                               


                        I’ve been wanting to write you a personal letter for some time.  I’ve even coveted greatly the opportunity of a personal interview, but the exigencies of war have robbed me of that high privilege.  What I really want to tell you is in my heart, and words are rather feeble conveyances.  So I’ll just say you’re so very welcome to our family circle.  You know already how wonderful your beautiful mother is, and how handsome your brother is.  Well, your old man might be a bit of a disappointment in that respect, but wait’ll you see him trying to be your pal!  Until that day, then, we’ll have to be content with a long-range correspondence.  Just remember that I love you, too.  Your Dad



            So among the first few words my 31-year-old father communicated to me were, “I love you”; at age 86, on November 27, 1999, the last day I would see him, they were among the final words he whispered to me, as well.  And throughout the fifty-five intervening years, I have felt that love, every single day, even when I was among the most unlovable adolescents in the Milky Way Galaxy.
            There are so many things that I will not be able to tell you about Dad today.  Things that time will not permit—some things others have already told you, or will tell you—some things that decorum and my mother and this setting (this building he loved) will not allow!  And because whatever I say will not suffice, anyway—will paint only the palest image of him—I’ll tell just a few stories and trust that they will communicate to you something of the man I miss so desperately today—and will continue to miss all my remaining days.
            In 1959 we were on one of our big jaunts West to see Dad’s family.  For most of those trips we had no air-conditioning in the car—can you imagine crossing the Great Salt Lake Desert without A/C?  In August?  Well, we did it—more than once.  As a result, we were constantly on the lookout for places to cool off: A & W Root Beer stands were our favorite—when we saw one, we would chant “A & W!  A & W!  A & W!” thinking, I guess, that Dad needed convincing to stop at one.  Fat chance.  He loved A & W Root Beer—“boot rear,” he called it—and he always ordered the largest stein, whose foamy contents he downed in a swift series of prodigious swigs.
            We loved swimming pools, too, although we rarely had the money to stay at motels with pools—we were lucky if there were beds to accommodate all five of us, lucky to have a door that locked and a toilet that flushed—or a toilet that was indoors.  Anyway,  in 1959 we stopped at Zion National Park, where we found a public pool.  It was brutally hot—August in the desert, you know—so we hurried to the bathhouse.  My brothers and I changed as fast as we could, sprinted for the pool, and jumped in.  It was ice water.  I mean glacially cold.   And as we stood there in the shallow end, forming human ice sculptures, here came Dad, ready for a swim.  “How’s the water, boys?” he called to us.  Dick, Dave, and I looked at one another.  No words were exchanged,  just glances.  “Great!” we cried.  “Really great!  Come on it—the water’s fine!”  And so Dad dropped his towel and dived in.  He came up rather quickly, as I remember, popped up out of the water right in front of us, like some kind of great marine mammal.  A blue one.  Dick, Dave, and I were laughing ourselves sick.  Dad, to his credit, laughed too—but warned: “You could have given me a heart attack!”  Which, of course,  made us laugh all the harder as we scrambled for the ladder.
            Dad loved to laugh.  And he had a great one, full and throaty, and sometimes—especially when he was recalling ribald childhood adventures with his brothers and sisters—he would laugh so hard he would have a difficult time catching his breath.  His face would glow like a space-heater, and his breath would come in great gasps.  All it took was a word or phrase from his past to get him going: Old Sid (a bull on the family farm), Teefy Heeb (a childhood neighbor), Snatch-‘n’-Grab-It (a game my mother will still not explain to me)—all these would set him off, and set us off, too, for we loved to watch him laugh.  We loved to laugh with him, even when we didn’t know what it was all about.  What I’d give to hear him laughing right now . . .
            Another view of Dad: Back in the mid-1950s while we were living in Enid, Oklahoma, Dad had a second major operation for kidney stones (the first had been during the war). Surgical scars circumscribed his considerable girth, and I still remember Mom and Dad in friendly debates about which was more painful: kidney stones or childbirth.  Neither parent, as I recall, gave much ground in that debate.  Anyway, that particular kidney stone produced one of the most frightening memories of my childhood.  We woke up in the middle of the night to see an ambulance in our driveway—our driveway!  A red light flashing on our street!  What was going on?  They were taking my father away!  Mom reassured us (she’s good at that), but for the rest of that night I was terrified I was going to lose him.  It was unthinkable.  It still is.  Needless to say, he survived that night—and many, many others.  But for a few weeks after he got home, he was so weak and fragile that he could move only painfully.  I couldn’t believe it—my father, the strongest man in the world, could hardly stand up, could only shuffle from room to room: a sad preview of his last years when disabilities stopped in his tracks the fastest high school sprinter in the state of Oregon, the pulling guard for the University of Oregon football team, the intrepid climber of Mt. Hood, the remarkable physical specimen that was my father.  I like to picture him—right now, especially now—on the summit of Mt. Hood on that exhilarating August day in 1937, full of youth and strength and pride in what he’d done, his whole life before him—with the Oregon he so deeply loved spread out below him like a vast green dream.  To the west he could see Portland and the coastal mountains beyond, the sunlight shimmering on the Columbia River; to the east, the Walla Walla Valley where he grew up.  His future lay that way: in Oklahoma (where he would meet my mother), in Ohio, in Iowa, Massachusetts.  He would retire before he would ever again live in Oregon.   So unthinkable—that this powerful, athletic man would slow down so incredibly, would one day find himself confined to a motorized  wheelchair (which, in his technologically challenged hands, became a weapon, an unguided missile that left bruises on walls and doorways and furniture residents throughout Melbourne, the last place he would call home), so unimaginable that he would one day lie in a bed at Springside and dream morphine dreams of mountains.  And struggle so hard just to breathe that we often found him soaked in the perspiration of his exertions.
            Well,  back in 1954 I knew none of this.  All I knew was that I wanted to play catch with Dad, just like always, kidney operation or no kidney operation, but I hesitated.  He seemed so sick.  So weak.  One day, though, I couldn’t stand it any longer.  I just had to play.  So I asked him.  There he sat in that Oklahoma living room, wearing only a bathrobe and slippers, his stitches still in his side, his face pale and pained; and there I stood, eager son, in my hands a ball and two baseball mitts—his and mine.  “C’mon, Dad,” I pled.  “Let’s play catch!”  And that man struggled to his feet, shuffled outside, put that mitt on that left hand that was missing its little finger (courtesy of a hatchet-wielding brother back on the farm), and tossed a baseball with me.  It was a lousy game of catch—we were only a few feet apart, and we probably exchanged only a half-dozen throws before he’d had enough.  But he did it, just because his son asked him to.  That was enough for him.  That was always enough for him.
            Oh, did he love his family.  One of the last days I saw him, Richard and I came into his room at Laurel Lake; Mom and Dave were already there.  When he saw all four of us together, his eyes brightened, and he said, over and over and over again, “Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful.”
            Yes, Dad, it was wonderful.  All of it.  Every last second of it.
            To end now, another quick story . . . my father loved to perform.  He sang with a soaring tenor voice, as most of you know, and he preached,  and he taught countless college classes, and he spoke to numerous civic and educational organizations, booming out his words in that stentorian voice which some prairie teacher of preachers had taught him to use—to keep the faithful awake, I suppose. 
            Well, among his many performances was an appearance in a Phillips University production of Shakespeare’s As You Like It.  Dad played Charles the Wrestler, not a major role, if you remember.  Charles has only a handful of lines—a little exposition, a little action.  But I’m betting they picked Dad for several reasons: He was a big, muscular man—he looked like a wrestler—he was a good performer, and, hey, his name was Charles, too, though no one who knew him ever called him that.  Mom used Rit and her extraordinary sewing skills to transform some ordinary sweat pants into red Elizabethan wrestling tights, and I can still remember Dad leaving the house that first night, already in that crimson costume, stopping at the front door to strike a pose, flexing his biceps, posing like the Superman I always thought he was.
            In As You Like It, Charles is the Duke’s champion wrestler; he challenges all comers.   Our hero, the young Orlando, decides to take on Charles.  We don’t think he has much of a chance—he is a slight youth; Charles is so formidable, strutting around the stage, his muscles rippling.  And when he arrives at the ring, he bellows: “Come, where is this young gallant that is so desirous to lie with his mother earth?”  “Ready, sir,” replies Orlando modestly.  Well, much to the delight of the onlooking women—and the audience—Orlando defeats Charles the Wrestler, who has to be carried off.
            In his final weeks of life, Dad switched roles: He became Orlando, and forced Death to play Charles the Wrestler.  Time and time again, Dad threw to the canvas this ancient and awful enemy, surprising everyone—except, of course,  those who knew him.  Doctors gave him minutes to live; he took weeks.  Nurses warned of imminent death; they too were wrong.  He heard final prayers from Michael far more than once.  His wife and sons rushed repeatedly to his bedside, only to find him watching football or eating pie, wondering what all the fuss was about.
            Six weeks ago, in his hospital room, when we thought he was surely dying, we played a tape of him singing “The Lord’s Prayer,” a recording he had made a half-century ago.  And when he heard the piano’s opening measures, Dad began mouthing the words, half-singing some of it; he raised his right hand from his side and conducted himself, keeping perfect time, as usual.  We were all crying, every one of us.  And when the tape was over, Dad clapped softly and whispered, “Bravo.”
            I am not going to whisper “Bravo” for my father today.  Never again will I merely whisper it.  As I look back over his long life—especially over his last difficult years and days and hours—as I think of all that he has meant to my mother, to me, to my brothers, to his daughters-in-law, to his grandchildren, and to all others whom he has touched, I can not whisper “Bravo.”  Instead, I will  cry it, cry it aloud.  I will cry “Bravo!” out into the heavens.  And unto the stars.  Whence he came.

Thursday, March 8, 2018

Are Robots Coming to Get Us? (And If They Are ...?): Conclusion


So ... small world. Not long after I posted yesterday about the current fear of robots taking over, I paged through the March 5 issue of the New Yorker and found the cartoon you see sitting at the top of this page.

And one more little update: On Tuesday's Daily Show (which we stream the next day) the focus was on, well, sex-toy robots--apparently a booming industry. The reporter, the very talented Desi Lydic, took us to a place that designs and manufactures the devices (see image below). Funny and profoundly weird.



Anyway, yesterday I ended the post with a question about what we'll do when robots have taken all the jobs they can take.

And the answer to me is both simple and hard, both necessary and enormously expensive. And here it is: Invest heavily in public education.

(Not surprising idea--is it?--from a guy who taught in a public school for thirty years!)

Right now many (most?) of our schools are a mess. Many (Most?) are horribly underfunded--teachers overloaded--facilities crumbling--etc. All are at the mercy of voters--a ridiculous situation. (Why should you get to vote on whether or not your local school has any money?)

Most, too, are caught in a sticky spider's web of standardized testing. I've written here before that our older grandson, who just turned 13, has already taken more such tests than I did, K-Ph.D. It's insane. And we use the results from them to assess not just kids but teachers, schools, school districts, states. Yet many refuse to recognize that we test only those things that are relatively easy to measure--and those things often are, well, not all that important.

But we are inebriated by numbers. If it's got a number on it, we believe it (unless, of course, it contradicts a bias we have). So  for example, we read something like this: Only 34% of the 8th graders reached the level of "competence."

That's horrible! we think, perhaps never pausing to ask: What's on that test? What does "competence" even mean in this case? And hosts of other questions.

No, instead we wring our hands, sharpen the focus of the curriculum even more on the things that are easiest to measure, thereby denying kids even more the education we've promised them. The test becomes the curriculum, in other words. (Heard that before?)

So ... here's a pie-in-the-sky solution to all of this:

  • Invest heavily in the schools--at a Pentagon level. All of our public schools.
    • Make all of our school buildings attractive, technologically contemporary--places that kids would love to spend their days.
  • Use tests only to help individual kids.
  • Raise teachers' salaries significantly (this will attract to the profession some bright folks who now choose other professions).
  • Hire employees (at all positions) who love kids, who love to learn, who are quick on their feet, who are devoted, who ... you know ...
  • Diminish teachers' workloads Some years I taught as many as 200 students a day. Really. So ... how much attention does your kid get when he's/she's competing with 199 others?
  • Flood the buildings with books and other learning materials.
  • Broaden the curriculum. Kids should experience in school reading and writing and arithmetic, of course--but also history and psychology and literature and music and painting and sociology and sculpture and sciences of all sorts. The curriculum should be so rich, in fact, that kids go home every day feeling as satiated and happy as if they'd just eaten a superior cheesecake. (But with a next-day craving for more!)
  • Etc.
So ... what will all this accomplish? It will prepare our students for ... whatever.. Things are changing rapidly in our world--technologically and otherwise. And the more you know, the better you can adapt to change. The less you know--the more narrow your education--the more likely it is that the torrents of change will drag you under. Drown you.

So ... robots, schmobots. They do what they're programmed to do. But let's quit treating our youngsters as if they're robots--narrowly programming them for narrow lives. We're boring the hell out of our youngsters, peppering them with pedantry, forcing them to look through the narrowest of life's lenses.

Wednesday, March 7, 2018

Are Robots Coming to Get us? (And If They Are ...?)



I posted here long ago about my earliest memories of a robot (link to 2015 post). A boy in Oklahoma in the early 1950s, I used to watch a local program called 3-D Danny. It was a futuristic thing, and Danny (oh, I loved the name!) had a device he called a Synchro Retroveter, which could take viewers back in time to see, oh, Western adventures (old movies--duh). He also had a companion, a friendly robot named Bazark. (Here's a link to a YouTube video of the show.)

3-D Danny & Bazark
Anyway, back then the friendly Bazark convinced me that robots were, well, awesome. It wasn't until later years--and lots of sci-fi films--that I grew to see how menacing they are! They want to take over!

Lately, there's been a bit of publicity (and dire warning) about robots: They're coming for our jobs! This week, for example, The Daily Show is featuring a segment each day about robots and the economy and the labor force. And the worries ...

Of course, there is not a thing new about any of this. Since that unnamed prehistoric human invented the wheel, people have been losing jobs to technological advances. (Gorgo, your services are no longer required to carry these boulders: I now have a ... wagon!)

It happened slowly at first, accelerated during the Industrial Revolution (mid-18th to mid-19th century). Many people lost their jobs, their livelihoods, their professions because of it. Melville's "Bartleby, the Scrivener" (1853) is about a guy who copied things, by hand, because copy machines and typewriters, and the like were not yet available. (Bartleby's famous line: "I would prefer not to." Pretty soon, he wasn't able to!)

One other example: The family of Andrew Carnegie came here from Scotland in 1848 (he was a young teen) because his father's occupation--weaver--was rapidly changing: Machines were doing more and more of the work. So ... off to America for a fresh start ...

Gradually, automation and machinery became the villains in many a human story. In England there were the Luddites in the late 18th century; a group of anti-tech folks who destroyed the machinery that they believed was destroying their lives.

And in popular culture the idea of machine-as-enemy rose to become a common theme. I used to show to some of my public-school classes Charlie Chaplin's film Modern Times (1936), which has the famous (and metaphorical) image of the Tramp caught up in the machinery in the factory where he worked--and where he was going mad. (You can now see the entire film on YouTube.)


In recent years, the computer-and/or robot-as-enemy is a popular theme in the movies. The idea plays with one of our most fundamental fears: We are not really necessary.

Yeah, some robots are friendly (C3PO, R2D2), but others (most?) are frightening (some of those Evil Transformers).

Anyway, one question emerging from all of this, a question I heard last night on The Daily Show: What will we humans do when machines can do better than we can most of our quotidian and industrial tasks?

Well, I have an answer for that ... tune in tomorrow for the next episode of 3-D Danny, 2018, available on this site!

TO BE CONTINUED ...

Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Spring Chatter, 2018



I'm already hearing it here and there--coffee shop, health club, grocery store: talk about where spring is. These conversations invariably then move to dour comments about, you know, "northeastern Ohio," the place where seasons, especially the pleasant ones, (a) are never born, (b) go to die.

Well, it's cold; some snow lingers in our yard; and--most damning--the calendar tells us it's not spring yet, not until Tuesday, March 20, at 3 p.m., at which time, I'm sure, the birdies will sing; the clouds will puff into pure white; the daffodils will come out, "fluttering and dancing in the breeze" (as Wordsworth put it in "I Wandered Lonely As a Cloud"*); the temperatures will rise abruptly into the 70s and remain there until next winter; "the rain will never fall till after sundown"--as King Arthur sings in Camelot. Etc.

Hah.

When I was in junior high and high school at the Hiram School (barely a half-hour from where we live now) I hated March and April in Ohio. I would sit upstairs in the old study hall and look to the west and see the dark clouds swelling and moving toward us, timed to arrive (a) at recess, (b) right after school (destroying baseball practice or a game), (c) right when ... I didn't want them to.

It had been a little worse in Oklahoma in my earlier boyhood: Sometimes the dark clouds vomited forth a funnel.

My annoyance didn't change when I got to college. There goes tennis practice, I would say as the ark-worthy rain would commence right at 4:00, our scheduled time for double-faulting.

Old Guys carry umbrellas. This is a principle I discovered when I became an Old Guy. And it's true: Even when the Weather Channel app tells me there's only a 10% chance of precip, I hoist my umbrella from its stand (yes, we have an umbrella stand) and head fearlessly out into the ... sunshine.

Sometimes people, seeing me on a sunny afternoon with an umbrella, will wax wise: Well, Dan, you're keeping the rain away--that sort of thing. Ha, ha.

I smile, certain that Poseidon will soon be swimming in our street. And I have occasionally seen him.

But grousing about spring in northeastern Ohio is like complaining about the smell of pizza in a pizzeria. It's where we are; it's what we experience here. And all we can do is wait--and wonder what on earth we're doing here.


*I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud
By William Wordsworth

I wandered lonely as a cloud
That floats on high o'er vales and hills,
When all at once I saw a crowd,
A host, of golden daffodils;
Beside the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.

Continuous as the stars that shine
And twinkle on the milky way,
They stretched in never-ending line
Along the margin of a bay:
Ten thousand saw I at a glance,
Tossing their heads in sprightly dance.

The waves beside them danced; but they
Out-did the sparkling waves in glee:
A poet could not but be gay,
In such a jocund company:
I gazed—and gazed—but little thought
What wealth the show to me had brought:

For oft, when on my couch I lie
In vacant or in pensive mood,
They flash upon that inward eye
Which is the bliss of solitude;
And then my heart with pleasure fills,
And dances with the daffodils.


Monday, March 5, 2018

A Somewhat Normal Day ...

I posted here not long ago about the wonder of the normal, about how our quotidian routines can bore us--until we can no longer experience them. (Link to that post from Dec. 17, 2017.)

Visitors to this site know that my past few weeks have been far from my normal. I've been undergoing immunotherapy for my metastatic prostate cancer, a process that began on January 16 and did not officially cease until the past Friday.

I say "officially cease" because I had some lingering after-effects that did not soften, really, until late yesterday and on into today. Some mild nausea, extreme weariness, some disorientation and dizziness.

Because of all of this--and you can add to the mix the flu that Joyce and I "enjoyed" early in my treatments, an illness that disrupted all and caused some scheduling hassles for everyone involved--my normal routines altered considerably.

  • I have not been able to go to the health club and exercise in several weeks. (Okay, this is not exactly my favorite thing to do, and I must say that I preferred the afternoon naps to the stationary bike and rowing machine!). Still, I know I must do it--go to the club--for a variety of reasons.
  • I had a catheter installed to ease the process of infusion, so I've been unable to take a shower or shave for two and a half weeks. So, into the bathtub I went, a place I have not regularly gone since early in our marriage when we lived in humble shower-less apartments and rental properties.
    • Compounding this: I could not get the catheter area wet, so Joyce had to wash my hair for me while I sat in the tub like a wannabe Moby-Dick (very white, increasingly cetacean because of my inability to exercise) and clutched to my neck (the catheter's entry point) a towel.
  • Some days I have just not been strong enough to go over to Open Door Coffee Co., where I normally spend a few hours (mornings, afternoons) reading and writing and whatever.
  • And--one that doesn't seem so odious (but was): I was unable to sleep on my side (a favorite) and instead had to spend all night on my back. This, I know, is hardly oppressive, but it was new and frustrating for me.
But today--Mr. Normal returned (somewhat). Last night I slept some on my side, and today I was able to shower, to shave, to walk over to the coffee shop, to do my work there, to walk home, to sit in my grandfather Osborn's desk chair and type these words of relief. And gratitude.

One other vaguely related insight: I would invite all politicians (and others) who oppose universal health care to spend a day walking around Seidman Cancer Center, sitting in the waiting areas, talking with patients and their loved ones. Watching the physical and psychological suffering. (Mine, by the way, is minimal by comparison.)

If you emerge from such an experience still believing that health care is a privilege rather than a right--an act of government overreach rather than a humane act of collective empathy and compassion--well, it's evident that your soul has somehow escaped you and fled in terror from such a pure and disturbing and reeking darkness.

Sunday, March 4, 2018

Sunday Sundries, 178


1. AOTW: No one specific example this week--but just an annoyance that's been building. To all motorists out there who do not want to win the AOTW Award (so coveted, so eagerly sought): In your lane? Near a stoplight? That broad white line painted completely across your lane means STOP HERE, AOTW! There's a reason that line is there!

2. Via Kindle I finished just one book this week (not counting the weekly book I do for Kirkus Reviews): the latest mystery by Colin Harrison (1960-), You Belong to Me (2017). I can't remember when/why I started reading Harrison's books (they number about 10 now), but I'm glad I did. Intelligent and wry, exciting at times. Puzzles that are fun to try to solve.

This recent one involves a NYC lawyer named Paul, a guy who loves old maps of Manhattan, and one subplot (that ends up not being so sub-) involves his attempts to acquire a very valuable one. Then--the murder-n-stuff. A good woman is married to a bad guy. She's also involved with a former lover. The husband, very jealous, finds out, and ...  The stories eventually intersect.

Try some Harrison--I think you'll like/love it.

3. Still streaming a bit each night of "our" shows: Line of Duty, Vera, Doc Martin. Also enjoying (for more that just the first time) the comedy of John Mulaney, whose specials (just two, I think) are on Netflix.

I see he's doing a couple of shows in Cleveland mid-month ... might have to check him out!

4. I usually bake sourdough bread on Sundays, but ... this week was a little ... different ... so I just fed the starter today (see pic of my starter, which will turn 32 years old this August!); I'll use it for waffle batter later in the week.



5. Last Word: a word that piqued my curiosity this week ...

Joyce and I were laughing about each other's quirks the other day, and I stopped to wonder (nerd that I am) where quirk came from. And guess what? No one's too sure. But it dates back to the mid-sixteenth century--1565, the year after Shakespeare was born. Here's the Webster's def. Oh, and I just checked my Shakespeare concordance, and I see he used it about a half-dozen times--not usually in the sense that we do. But here's one--that speech in Much Ado about Nothing when Benedick is fooled into thinking Beatrice loves him--and he is talking to the audience about how this will look because he has so long laughed at marriage (2.3):

Benedick: I may chance have some odd quirks and remnants of wit broken on me, because I have rail’d so long against marriage; but doth not the appetite alter? A man loves the meat in his youth that he cannot endure in his age. 

Copyright ©2005-2017 by PlayShakespeare.com.
Visit http://www.playshakespeare.com/license for details.




quirk noun \ˈkwərk\
plural -s
1 :  a triangular shaped area: such as
a (1) dialectal, England :  a hosiery clock (2) :  a small gusset set in at the base of a thumb or the fingers of a glove
b :  a diamond-shaped windowpane
2 :  an abrupt turn, twist, or curve or other deviation from a regular course or pattern :  bend, crook: such as
a (1) :  a turn of a pen in writing :  flourish (2) obsolete :  a sudden whimsical turn or phrase in music
b (1) :  a clever retort :  conceit, quip (2) :  a clever or cunning evasion :  subterfuge, quibble
c :  a peculiarity of action, behavior, or bearing :  mannerism
3 obsolete :  a sudden fit :  short paroxysm
4 a :  a small channel or groove separating a bead or other molding from the adjoining members — see quirk molding
b :  the bead or fillet of a grooving plane in woodworking

origin unknown


First Known Use: 1565