Dawn Reader

Dawn Reader
from Open Door Coffee Co.; Hudson, OH; Oct. 26, 2016

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Two Things ...

Joyce's classroom
Writing House
Hiram College
Just before the final class of her career

I didn't post anything yesterday--too busy (see below!). But here are two items, one of immense importance, the other ... just a curiosity.

1. Yesterday--May 9--my wife, Joyce, taught the final class of her wonderful career that began in the fall of 1969 when I saw her head up the hill to teach her first class in Satterfield Hall at Kent State University. She had started work on her master's degree in English and as part of her graduate assistantship at KSU she taught a section (two?) of freshman English.

We had met at Satterfield, only a couple of months earlier, July 1969, and had already decided to marry, which we would do on December 20. She was still living at home in the fall of 1969 (Akron's Firestone Park), but she used the new apartment I'd rented in Kent as sort of "home base" during her days at KSU.

She became a spectacular teacher--winning every teaching award Hiram College offered (some more than once), and she won, as well, a national award (from the National Endowment for the Humanities) and was honored with other winners (one per state) at the White House. Here we stand with Barbara Bush that day.
She worked so hard for her students--in class and out. (Her comments on papers were the most lengthy I've ever seen! By far.) She prepared thoroughly, taught intensely, dealt with students compassionately. She was a wonder, and during the past few days as her former students have become aware of her retirement, her Facebook page has sprung alive with love and gratitude.

Anyway, yesterday, without telling her, I sneaked over to Hiram, sneaked into her room (it was a moment or two before she saw me--she was so focused), interrupted things, told her final class some things about her, about us, then recited Shakespeare's Sonnet 18 ("Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?), weeping the while. (I won't say what her eyes were doing, but--let's just say--they were not unaffected.)

I drove home, thinking about her astonishing career, her accomplishments, the love that flowed between her and her students ... for decades.

How can that all possibly be over?

But she is ready--more than ready. For nearly a decade she's been working hard on a book about abolitionist John Brown; she's nearing the end of her umpteenth revision; needs chunks of time to focus on it exclusively. And now she has it.

And I have a ringside seat ... no greater gift have I ever received ...


2. Followers of this site know that I've been reading my way through the works of John A. Williams (1925-2015), a writer I'd never even heard of until I saw his obituary in the New York Times last summer. Well, one of his recent books I finished (Flashbacks, 1973) was a collection of his journalism over the previous twenty years. He occasionally published in Holiday, so I thought it would be fun to own one of those old magazines, so I hopped on eBay, found one (not too pricey), and it just came the other day (see below).
January 1967
And now ... one of those weird coincidences that rivals in gooseflesh production only one other experience I've had (later): In the table of contents, look what I found ... first photo is of the entire page; the second, of two names that jarred me with their close proximity.


The reason? Well, if you don't recall, the previous writer whose complete works I charged through was ... John O'Hara (you can Google the numerous entries I have about him--DawnReader O'Hara). So there they are, in the same magazine in 1967, one name below the other's. Too weird. Gooseflesh time.

O'Hara died in 1970, so this was near the end of his career; Williams was about midway.

The only other experience I've had that rivaled this occurred when Joyce was working on her book about Kate Chopin (1850-1904) some years ago (The Awakening: A Novel of Beginnings, 1993). She told me that Chopin's final story published during her lifetime (1902), "Polly," was in Youth's Companion, July 3, 1902. (See below.)


In that same issue is a story called "The 'Fuzziness' of Hoockla-Heen," written near the beginning of his career by ... Jack London (on whom I'd done considerable research, considerable writing). Kate Chopin's final story; one of Jack London's earliest; same issue of same magazine ... weird. Joyce and bought a copy; it's framed on my study wall ...



Oh, and you want something even more weird about it? (I just checked.) London's story ends on the same page--p. 334--that Chopin's begins.

Sunday, May 8, 2016

Sunday Sundries, 101


1. AOTW--The parent (I'll not name a gender) who sat beside his/her little daughter (1.5? 2?); she was already playing with a hand-held gaming device; they ignored each other, each lost in a digital device. These are years and moment you can never recover--and you're losing them ... Made me far more sad than annoyed ...

2. I finished two books this week ...

  • Infinite Jest (1996) by the late David Foster Wallace (b. 1962, d. a suicide by hanging in 2008).
    • It was almost a year ago when I posted here about how and why I finally started reading Wallace's novel. (Link to that old post.) Prompting me was former WRA student Sam
      Clark; I saw him reading the book in the Open Door Coffee Co., and I, uh, sort of, uh, feigned/let on (lied?) that I had read it, too. Later, before a large scarlet IJ appeared on my breast, I pulled the book from the shelf and began ... June 11, 2015. And, as I said, I finished it just about a week ago (May 2). Okay, so it took me nearly 11 months. There are reasons.
    • For one--it's very long (1079 pp in my copy); the pages are big; the print is kinda small; DFW doesn't seem to see the necessity for paragraph breaks; the story is dense and complicated.
    • For another--I'm always reading other things--professionally (for book reviews), for curiosity (whatever), for fun. IJ is with my"bedtime" books--titles I pick away at every evening, approx. 10 pp/book. Right now here's what's with that group: Tobias Smollett's Travels Through France and Italy, Cori McCarthy's You Were Here; Stephen King's 11/22/63; Mary Beard's SPQR; John Irving's Avenue of Mysteries. I try to read 10 pp from each book each evening, but I don't always make it--especially with DFW.
    • I know that DFW has an enormous fan base. When I posted on FB that I'd finished the book, some of my friends "liked" it; some said it was their favorite book of all time.
    • I should admit here that I was not really "fair" to the book, reading it over an 11-month period. It's not the sort of novel that works well with that kind of schedule--especially at my age when I can forget the reason I just walked into another room in the house.
    • It was not among my favorite books--in fact (confession), I had to force myself to finish it. (Again--probably the fault of my reading schedule.) I did very much admire the book--such a complicated, inventive narrative--and I also laughed quite a bit (where I was supposed to, I hope). Also--I played on my college tennis team--and taught in a couple of summer tennis camps--so I really related to and enjoyed a lot of that stuff in the novel. I also saw all kinds of autobiographical stuff--especially the struggles with drugs, which, of course, DFW experienced for years. But, sadly, the fact is: I would not have finished it had not I kept running into Sam and his family down at Open Door!
    • Sam and I are going to meet this summer (he warns!) to talk about the book, and I have some notes and comments--and many questions. So that should be fun. But--for me--is was not a book to enjoy so much (as I said) as to admire. It is an astonishing achievement--but was not the best bedtime story for an Old Guy ...
  • The Junior Bachelor Society (1976), another novel by the vastly underrated John A. Williams (1925-2015), of whom (as I've written here repeatedly) I'd not even heard until I read his obituary in the New York Times last July 6  (link to that obit). I decided then that I'd read one,
    just to see what was going on, and since then I've decided to read them all, in the order he wrote them; I've read eight of his twelve novels, two of his six works of nonfiction. And I am both impressed and depressed--the former because of the quality of his work, the latter because of my ignorance. Bachelor, as I started to read it, bore a plot similarity to Broadway's hit play, That Championship Season, by Jason Miller (1972), a play that won the Pulitzer for Drama in 1973 (and some other awards). Both stories deal with a reunion of former athletes to honor their long-ago coach. But that's where the similarities end--just with the device. Season takes place in a living room where the players and coach have gathered. Some ugliness emerges in the course of the three-act drama.
    • Bachelor follows a number of characters--the coach, the former players, their lovers--
      multiple points of view throughout. And the plot also contains the story of a recent crime. One of the former players (Moon) has become a fairly successful pimp out in LA (the story takes place upstate New York), but in a confrontation, Moon kills a corrupt cop and is on the run. He decides he will stop briefly at the reunion, where ... well, some stuff happens.
    • I found the pimp-on-the-run the least interesting part of the novel; better, I thought, were the memories of the men, the struggles they've had in their lives (all are black), the varieties of peace they're beginning to make with themselves--and with one another. Some is very moving, affecting.
    • I've already got Williams' next novel on my pile--!Click Song (1982).
3. Is there a TV series more ironically titled that Happy Valley--streaming on Netflix--about a woman cop (played by the amazing Sarah Lancashire--also in the show Last Tango in Halifax, playing a very different character from this one), a West Yorkshire cop who gets involved in some nasty cases. We are partway through episode 2.2 (there are 6 episodes in Season 2), and it's all I can do to make myself watch it. I greatly admire her--love the ambiance--but her life is so grim (as is her profession) that it's just difficult--at least for me--to binge-watch. (Unlike, say, Death in Paradise, which has a far more playful attitude.)



4. Last night (Saturday) we started watching (Netflix DVD) a film I (for a reason I cannot recall) suddenly began thinking about a few weeks ago. The film--36 Hours (1964)--stars James Garner (pre-Rockford Files, though he had starred in a Western TV series Maverick (1957-62); Rod Taylor; Eva Marie Saint. I didn't know until I looked at the credits that the script is based on a story by Roald Dahl, "Beware of the Dog" (available on Google Docs), a tale I've not read, but I just printed it out; I'll read it tonight, report on it soon in this space.

  • The film takes place on the eve of D-Day, and the Nazis, uncertain where and when the invasion will occur, drug and kidnap James Garner (an American officer who knows all) and try to convince him that the war has been over for six years. Their hope: To get him to talk willingly. They have an entire "set" erected to resemble a military hospital; everyone speaks flawless English.
  • We stopped last night, about halfway through, and Garner has already said "Normandy," and the Nazis are hoppin' happy.
  • I remember seeing the film at the old Hiram College Cinema (our "Sunday night at the movies," open to the public). I see that it was released late in November 1964 (my junior year at Hiram College), so I suspect it didn't make it to Hiram until later in 1965--maybe the summer?
  • More later ...



Saturday, May 7, 2016

WRA Speech, Part 3 of 3

I've decided to post the text of the speech I gave at WRA on April 8. It was part of a lecture series named for Keir Marticke, a WRA student who graduated in 2002 and, tragically, died during a trip to Vietnam while she was in college. Her father and brother were in the audience.

PS--I should note (pride, pride, oh fatal pride!) that all the poems I reproduce here are lines I recited from memory during the talk.

Well, as I grew older, and moved out into the world, became a teacher, I wasn't much more together than a Judd Apatow character, but I realized very quickly that I still really needed some Big People in my life—desperately so—and so I sought them out. I was extraordinarily fortunate in the earliest years of my career to work with some of the greatest teachers I would ever know. I’m going to tell you a little about just one of them:
• Eileen Kutinsky—“Mrs. K, the kids called her. She taught 6th grade science, and her room was the most alive classroom I’ve ever seen—not just in the eager interactions among the kids but in the room’s décor. Animal cages, plants, displays—things, living and otherwise, were jammed in her room (snakes-lizards-fish-cacti!); later, she brought a cow to school (she lived on a farm) and had the kids taking care of it, milking it, making cheese and ice cream. It was amazing.
But there were others—a 1st-grade teacher, an 8th-grade math teacher, a reading teacher, an art teacher, a high school English teacher. They worked the kids hard, but the kids still loved them. Learned from them. And seeing those magicians, I decided: I’m gonna steal from those people!
And when I first came here to WRA in the fall of 1979 (the fall I would turn 35—more than half my life ago), there were some towering teachers here who taught me as well as their students—you can see their pictures on the walls over in Seymour: Bob and Velia Price (French teachers), Bill Appling (vocal music), Sherwin Kibbe (history and English), Russ Hansen (biology), Bill Westfall (history). I also had the great fortune to share a home with one of my own Big People—my wife, Joyce Dyer (English), a superb teacher. Anyway,  I latched onto them like a lonely leech. Learned and stole all I could.
So this is one piece of advice I’ll suggest this morning—to all of us: Never stop your search for the Big People. They’re around, wherever you are. And be alert: They may be younger than you are.

Let’s leave the young now and move on to the Old Guys—to the period, as Hamlet said, when we suffer the whips and scorns of time. Old age used to be simpler—and shorter. (Shakespeare died at fifty-two.)
In some cases you end could be grim. In his 1901 short story “The Law of Life,” Jack London (The Call of the Wild/White Fang guy) wrote about a band of Native Americans in the remote North. This tribe of nomads is moving on—and leaving behind one of the elders, a man who can no longer, well, keep up. They give him some food, some warm clothing, a campfire, a little extra firewood, then bid him a quick farewell and move on. Most of the story deals with the old man’s thoughts and memories, but near the end … the wolves arrive. They circle him.
 The old man listened to the drawing in of this circle, writes London. He waved his [fire]brand wildly, and sniffs turned to snarls; but the panting brutes refused to scatter. Now one wormed his chest forward, dragging his haunches after, now a second, now a third; but never a one drew back. Why should he cling to life? he asked, and dropped the blazing stick into the snow. It sizzled and went out. The circle grunted uneasily, but held its own. … [He] dropped his head wearily upon his knees. What did it matter after all? Was it not the law of life?
Well, that’s a happy story! But be grateful: Things are a little different now … in most places. My generation—called the Baby Boomers—are now retiring, aging, looking for places to spend our final days. Recently, you’ve surely noticed that assisted-living and nursing and stages-of-care facilities are popping up everywhere—some right here in Hudson. They’re getting ready for me. I hope they have no wolves on staff. I can just see it:
ATTENDANT: Danny, how was you pudding today?
ME: Great pudding. Just great.
            ATTENDANT: Danny, you have some visitors today.
ME: Visitors? How nice. [door opens]
ROAR OF WOLVES

Poet and novelists and playwrights have always written about the indignities—and fears—of old age. Take Samuel Taylor Coleridge (are you still reading about the ancient mariner in English I?). In another of his poems, “Youth and Age,” from the 1820s, Coleridge has a speaker sigh about getting older.
When I was young?—Ah, woeful when!
Ah, for the change ’twixt Now and Then!
This breathing house not built with hands,
This body that does me grievous wrong,
O’er aery cliffs and glittering sands
How lightly then it flash’d along:
Like those trim skiffs, unknown of yore,
On winding lakes and rivers wide,
That ask no aid of sail or oar,
That fear no spite of wind or tide!
Nought cared this body for wind or weather
When Youth and I lived in’t together.

An aging Coleridge would have other things to worry about today. We all know about the acceleration of technology—and how it sometimes can leave the elderly behind. (Just today I saw a Facebook meme: It shows an old man pointing to his electronic device and saying, “I texted you several times.” And his younger companion says, “That’s a calculator.”) The last piece of technology my dad could use was a TV remote. He never learned to use a personal computer, an ATM, a cell phone—he never even learned to use a self-serve gas pump. The self-checkout over at Acme would have sent him over the edge. My mom, by contrast, was a very early and skillful computer user. She was the first to have one in our family—the mid 1970s, an Apple II. And until just a few years ago we were able to keep in touch via email. Now, sadly, she can’t remember how to turn her laptop on and off, how to navigate to her email, and her arthritic fingers just won’t cooperate. But she is a proud woman, and that old laptop still sits prominently on the table in her assisted-living unit. Rage, rage against the dying of the light, said poet Dylan Thomas in 1951.

So we’ve seen that poets have raged. Novelists have, too. The final works by America’s great Philip Roth deal with the issue over and over again—The Dying Animal (2001), Exit Ghost (2007) and The Humbling (2009)—the very titles revealing much of their subject matter. Roth, by the way, was in his late 70s when he wrote these books. He’s still alive (he just turned 83), but feeling he’s “losing it,” he no longer writes. I could stand up here all morning and tell you about other novelists who’ve written about aging—but you get the point.
Oh, okay, one more: In 1882 the great Victorian novelist Anthony Trollope published one of his final works, The Fixed Period. In this brief tale, he tells about a community on the fictional South Pacific island of Britannula, where the new settlers decide to establish what they call “The Fixed Period,” a law that says no one on the island can live beyond 67.5 years. They see this as a move that's both humane (no more suffering and indignities of old age) and economically responsible (it will save on medical costs!). As folks draw close to the age limit, they will be taken to a nice facility where they will live in comfort—until they’re, you know, killed. Nicely, of course. Very nicely. No wolves involved! Well, all goes well until the first few settlers begin to approach 67.5, The Fixed Period. Then, let's say, attitudes begin to change.
And in films and TV? In recent years, I’ve noticed, it’s become more and more common to show the elderly as comic characters—foul-mouthed, raunchy. You surely know about Hot in Cleveland, Bad Grandpa and Dirty Grandpa.
But you've probably noticed, too, that there are some films aimed directly at the Baby Boomers. The Most Exotic Marigold Hotel, The Lady in the Van—hey, anything with Judi Dench or Maggie Smith—or both! I loved The Lady in the Van, by the way. Stream it.
And playwrights? Well, of course Shakespeare wrote about it. (About the only subject he didn't write about was zombies! Though as you readers of Macbeth and Hamlet know, he's quite comfortable with witches and ghosts—but no hot young vampires fall in love with Juliet/Bella.) In his wrenching play King Lear—one of his last—Shakespeare wrote about an aging English king who decides he will both step down and divide his property among his three daughters.
Long story short—and I mean long: Lear ain’t no Saturday Night Live sketch. The 2008 film of Lear with Ian McKellan (Gandalf!) runs two hours and thirty-six minutes! Lear is the seventh longest of the Bard’s three dozen plays—some 3500 lines. The longest, Hamlet, by the way, comes in at 4024 lines. The shortest, The Comedy of Errors, only 1786.  (I know what you’re thinking: Why can’t we read that short one in school?! I’ll tell you why: Because it’s funny—and short—and you can understand it—and that’s not what school is for!)
Anyway … King Lear’s two older daughters profoundly betray him, and the youngest, Cordelia, whom Lear initially accused of disloyalty, turns out to be the most truthful and honest and loving and loyal of all. Lear is full of horrifying moments of old age—betrayal by children (at one point he cries, How sharper than a serpent’s tooth it is to have a thankless child (1.4)), depression, madness, and loss. For that is one of the most difficult aspects of getting older. Loss. If nonage is about acquiring, dotage is about losing.
            Near the end, the worst moment of all arrives—his beloved daughter Cordelia is killed offstage, and a devastated Lear carries her out into our view. And the words Shakespeare puts in Lear’s mouth at that moment? No words at all, not really, not at first. Not articulate speech. Just four sounds: Howl, Howl, Howl, Howl! Lear tenderly lays her down, uses a looking-glass to check for breath. There is none. Then he says some of the most devastating words in all of Shakespeare’s work:
Those lines resonated in a deeply personal way for Shakespeare. In 1596 he had lost his only son, Hamnet, age 11. We don’t know a thing about what happened to the boy—just the recording of his death in the local church register. But the agony of that loss would inform Shakespeare's writing for the rest of his career. You all still read Macbeth … Remember when the murderers arrive at Macduff’s castle? And the Macduffs’ little son? Imagine the typhoon of emotion in Shakespeare as he wrote that scene …

Well, I’m really making old age seem like something to look forward to, aren’t I? But there are wonders about it. The births of your grandchildren. The grandson who hands you a book to read to him, the one who admires your behind-the-back passes, the realization (or, maybe, the hope) that the good you’ve done in your life might just outweigh your failures, the touch of a loved one’s hand.

All right, we’re steaming toward the end here (no cheering! silent sighs of relief are fine). We’re now at the part about, well, about what you do when you’re occupying those years when it’s possible people will listen to you.
What do you say? And how?
First—You echo the best of what you’ve learned from the Big People in your lives. You want to be able to say—until the day you die, “I took notice and done better.”
Second—You share those ideas—maybe even truths—you’ve drawn from your own study, your career, your reflections, your experience. How has your thinking changed? Evolved!
Third—You reveal the contents of your heart … What have you stored there? How did it get there? What has love taught you? What have you learned about loss? And pain? Speak of it. Teach!
Poet Emily Dickinson called this sort of thing her “letter to the world.”
And how should you deliver your letter? Well, let’s steal some more from Miss Emily. [PAUSE]. Her grandfather Samuel Dickinson was once treasurer of Western Reserve College. Right here. He sat in this very Chapel when it was fairly new. And if you ever see his grave in the Dickinson family plot in Amherst, Mass., you’ll note that his headstone records that he died in Hudson, Ohio.
[PLAY]:
Emily Dickinson has a poem from 1862 about a novelty at the time: the railroad. (Not coincidentally, in the mid-1850s, her father had helped bring the railroad to her hometown of
Amherst.) In the poem, she compares the engine to a horse. Before I recite it, a bit about a biblical name she mentions—Boanerges. That name appears only once in the New Testament—in Mark 3:17. It’s a sort of nickname that Jesus gives to two young men, a name that means “sons of thunder,” according to the King James Version. So we assume those two dudes had loud voices.
Here we go—a train, a horse.
I like to see it lap the Miles -
And lick the Valleys up - 
And stop to feed itself at Tanks - 
And then - prodigious step

Around a Pile of Mountains - 
And supercilious peer
In Shanties - by the sides of Roads - 
And then a Quarry pare

To fit it’s sides
And crawl between
Complaining all the while
In horrid - hooting stanza - 
Then chase itself down Hill - 

And neigh like Boanerges - 
Then - prompter than a Star
Stop - docile and omnipotent
At it’s own stable door – 

Well, here’s what I say: During your middle years, when people decide you're worth listening to—or not—I urge you not to be like multi-dark Jaques and retreat to a cave. Instead, neigh like Boanerges—not necessarily bellow out in the streets, causing dogs to bark and babies to cry and neighbors to call 911. But you should neigh like Boanerges in a metaphorical sense. Get it out there. Work to become one of the Big People—one whom people want to listen to. Need to listen to. Keir Marticke did. We should too.
Oh, and even when you’re much older? Keep neighing like Boanerges—neigh like the wildest of wild horses—until you simply no longer can. A quick example, a very contemporary one—
            • The retired Harvard biologist Edward O. Wilson, a towering figure, now 87, continues to write eloquently about the life of and threats to this planet. Just last month he published yet another book—Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life. In it, he neighs like Boanerges: Meanwhile, he writes near the start, we thrash about, appallingly led, with no particular goal in mind other than economic growth, unfettered consumption, good health, and personal happiness (2). And the fate of our biosphere? To far too many people, he says, it’s just no biggie.

It’s fitting, I think, to give Keir the last word today. In her collection of poems, Through Her Window, she has one I especially love. Admire her talent—listen to her words—they’re  a guide to life.
“She Who Carried Hope,” pp. 68–9 in Through Her Window
She walks alone.
Out in the rain,
And the world around her comes undone,
The ground beneath her bends and cracks
Like bone,
The trees split limb through limb,
Revealing insides that are dried and brittle,
And the brown leaves peel like paper from the stem,
Flayed in flight by venom winds,
Settling on the earth in a red dust shadow,
Death sweeps the barren land upon which she walks,
Where her soft feet land they falter,
Her knees buckle, head bows,
But in her work this girl is tireless.
Footfall after footfall, hour follows hour,
She walks.
An orb cradled in her hands,
Callused palms, long thin fingers
Drawing warmth and strength from this small thing,
Called hope.


Friday, May 6, 2016

WRA Speech, Part 2 of 3

I've decided to post the text of the speech I gave at WRA on April 8. It was part of a lecture series named for Keir Marticke, a WRA student who graduated in 2002 and, tragically, died during a trip to Vietnam while she was in college. Her father and brother were in the audience.

PS--I should note (pride, pride, oh fatal pride!) that all the poems I reproduce here are lines I recited from memory during the talk.

So, anyway … I got to love Shakespeare so much that whenever one of my students said You seem to know a lot about Shakespeare? I would reply: Not as much as he knows about me.
That’s a lie. Oh, I wish I’d really said that! But I didn’t. I found it on Facebook about a month ago, on one of the Shakespeare sites I’ve “liked.” I just can’t lie about it—because my mother will somehow know, and then I’ll be dealing with some serious consequences. Daniel Osborn Dyer, you told a lie? In a chapel?!?
But that Facebook meme is true: Once you hack your way through the thickets of unfamiliar language, you realize the Bard is talking to you. About you. I get gooseflesh, thinking about it.
Anyway, in his wonderful mid-career play As You Like It—1599–1600—written just before Twelfth Night and Hamlet—there is a dark character named Jaques, the dark dark kind of dark dark dark guy who always has something dark-dark-dark-dark to say—remember Rachel Dratch playing Debbie Downer on Saturday Night Live? (If not, YouTube it.) I’m betting Debbie Downer was based on Jaques!
In Act II, Scene 7, Jaques delivers one of the most famous speeches in the entire English language … name of it, anyone? Yep. “All the world’s a stage.” Or “The Seven Ages of Man.” Here’s what he says … but first a few odd words it will help you to know before I launch into this.
All the world’s a stage,
            And all the men and women merely players:
            They have their exits and their entrances;     
            And one man in his time plays many parts,
            His acts being seven ages. At first the infant,
            Mewling and puking in the nurse’s arms.       Whimpering, crying weakly
            And then the whining school-boy, with his satchel
            And shining morning face, creeping like snail
            Unwillingly to school. And then the lover,
            Sighing like furnace, with a woeful ballad     An enclosed chamber to melt metal
            Made to his mistress’ eyebrow. Then a soldier,
            Full of strange oaths and bearded like the pard,         leopard
            Jealous in honour, sudden and quick in quarrel,        
            Seeking the bubble reputation
            Even in the cannon’s mouth. And then the justice,
            In fair round belly with good capon lined,     a castrated rooster—for tender meat
            With eyes severe and beard of formal cut,
            Full of wise saws and modern instances;        sayings
            And so he plays his part. The sixth age shifts
            Into the lean and slipper’d pantaloon,
            With spectacles on nose and pouch on side,
            His youthful hose, well saved, a world too wide
            For his shrunk shank; and his big manly voice,        
            Turning again toward childish treble, pipes
            And whistles in his sound. Last scene of all,
            That ends this strange eventful history,
            Is second childishness and mere oblivion,
            Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything.      without

I know, I know: That performance would not have impressed the judges at your recent Shakespeare contest. I know. I was one of those judges—and I’m not impressed.
But in that speech, you see how Shakespeare—more than 400 years ago—recognized that we are babies (sort of) twice in our lives (if we live long enough): at the beginning, at the end. Our final years. Second childishness, he called it. We all know that there are some cultures that revere rather than fear or infantilize the aged. How would you characterize ours?
Now … speaking of all this—a brief story about our other grandson, Carson, who just turned seven last Sunday. Not long ago, I was talking with my family about today—and Carson told me about a poem he liked, a poem by Shel Silverstein. (Oops, I just weakened my own argument: I listened to a kid!) I’ll bet some of you will remember this one from Silverstein’s book The Light in the Attic—a poem that in some ways is a kid’s version of that key idea in “All the world’s a stage ….” Here it is ...
The Little Boy and the Old Man by Shel Silverstein

Said the little boy, “Sometimes I drop my spoon.”
Said the old man, “I do that too.”
The little boy whispered, “I wet my pants.”
“I do that too,” laughed the little old man.
Said the little boy, “I often cry.”
The old man nodded, “So do I.”
“But worst of all,” said the boy, “it seems
Grown-ups don’t pay attention to me.”
And he felt the warmth of a wrinkled old hand.
“I know what you mean,” said the little old man.
Okay, back to As You Like It. At the end—as is common in Shakespeare’s comedies—there is a wedding. Actually, there are four weddings, and then, in a surprise, Hymen—the god of marriage—shows up to solemnize it all ...
Another mild digression!—sorry—can’t help it—dotage—a story about a shocking moment in my middle school teaching career: Back in February 1996, I took a carload of eighth graders to see As You Like It down at the Great Lakes Theater Festival in Cleveland. The kids loved the performance—especially the end, when Hymen appears. Here’s why: He was naked (well, not totally) and covered entirely in green-and-gold body paint—and glitter, head to toe. The kids erupted while I tried to pretend that … well, that everything was, you know, Shakespeare. Not dirty! This is culture! And in the car, on the way home, the girls—especially—could not stop talking about the end of the show—about the character they were now calling “The Glitter Guy.”
(By the way, near the end of the play, dark, dark, dark, dark, dark Jaques, who can’t stand all this happiness and light and partying and marrying, exits to go live, he says, in a cave.

I have to say that in some specific, limited ways we do listen to the young nowadays far more than when I was a kid. Let me give you a little For Instance: In my boyhood—long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away—there was a handbook on manners  called Etiquette written by Emily Post. This is my mother’s actual copy, published in 1939, five years before I was born. (She was getting ready for me!) There are chapters called “Manners for Motorists,” “Popularity, Fraternity House Party, and Commencement” (seniors, you should check that out), and “The Fundamentals of Good Behavior.”
Here’s one little bit of advice for parents concerning a child’s behavior in a little subsection called “Talking at Table”:
When older people are present at table and a child wants to say something, he must be taught to stop eating momentarily and look at his mother, who at the first pause in the conversation will say, “What is it, dear?” And the child then has his say. If he wants simply to launch forth on a long subject of his own conversation, his mother says, “Not now, darling!” or “Don’t you see that mother is talking to Aunt Mary?” (748).
Is it too obvious to say, “Times have changed”?
Here’s another change—at the movies. On the screen, young people—girls and boys—are doing things that never occurred in the movies of my childhood. Like smoking, drinking, drugging, swearing, … Glitter Guy stuff. And kicking butt. When I was growing up, the only characters who kicked butt were full-grown white men. For example, in The Lone Ranger TV series (1949–1957), the Ranger’s sidekick, Tonto (a Native American), was constantly losing fights to white men; the Ranger had to rescue him.
Nowadays, anyone can be an butt-kicker. Back in 2010, for example, I saw the film Kick-Ass, which features a young girl (she’s eleven!) who’s a martial arts expert and has little trouble dispatching the Big Bad Guys. Sometimes, too, as you know, teenagers in films even save the world. The earliest film I remember showing that was War Games in 1983.
And in other sorts of films—family dramas—the young nowadays are sometimes the Wise Ones; it’s the adults who are clueless and messed-up. How many times have you seen this? Messed-Up Dad or Messed-Up Mom hearing, if not welcoming, advice from Wise Teen about how the parent ought to be handling things.
That’s the exact opposite of the films and TV shows when I was a kid. Then, the kids were messed up or confused, and in highly popular TV shows like Father Knows Best,  the wise parents/adults helped the young navigate the torrents of their childhood and teenage years.

            Wise young people do appear in “serious” literature now and then. When I was teaching English III here in my most recent stint, I always used to assign Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. There’s a very quiet moment early in that novel, a moment that I love. Huck has run away from his violent, drunken, even homicidal father and is hiding out on a Mississippi River island near his hometown. While Huck’s there, he discovers he’s not alone. Jim is there too. Jim—an adult black slave Huck knows very well. Huck learns that Jim has also run away and is hoping to find and rescue his wife and children, who were sold elsewhere.
[Pause: While I was typing this, auto-correct changed Huck to Yuck.]
[Play]:
Both these runaways—a young white boy, an adult African American—realize they should join forces, and literary scholars now rank the story of their subsequent journey on a raft down the Mississippi River among the very best in all of American literature.
But, as I said, on that island there’s a quiet moment of immense significance that, if you’re not careful, can slip right by you (as it did me the first dozen times or so I read the novel). Huck and Jim, on the island, decide that Huck will slip into town to try to discover what’s going on. Do people know where they are? Or are people believing their cover stories?
Jim and Huck have found some old clothing from a house washed away in a Mississippi flood, and Jim suggests that when Huck goes into town, he should dress as a girl. So he puts on a dress and practices walking and talking like a girl. Observing, Jim tells him a couple of things he ought to do differently. And Huck says, I took notice, and done better (67).
When we looked at that passage in class, I always asked my English III-ers if they saw anything remarkable going on. Silence. Silence. Silence. (Teacher waits, waits, waits.) Then—pretty soon—someone would see it and say: “A white boy’s listening to a black man.” You betcha. But not just any white boy—a white boy in a border state some twenty years or so before the Civil War, a white boy who thinks black slavery is normal, a white boy who’s nonetheless taking advice from a runaway slave!
I took notice, and done better. I love that sentence, for it shows the true wisdom of the young, the inexperienced—the rest of us, really—all of us—discovering someone worth listening to, then doing it. Listening. Learning. Changing. This, I’m suggesting, is a trait you want to keep alive throughout your life. When you start thinking that you have nothing more to learn from anyone else, well, that’s when you’re now a tree that’s stopped growing and is rapidly turning into firewood.
This has been one of the most astonishing discoveries for me on Facebook. I am friends with former students all the way back to the beginning of my career. My first seventh graders—back when I was a BOY— are now in their early sixties. And some of those “kids” have spent the last fifty years growing; others seem really unchanged in any fundamental way since I first knew them at age 12. They are like that Copper Age man found in a glacier in the Alps in 1991. Frozen in the past. And the scary part? Some of these “frozen kids” were among the most talented youngsters I ever taught.

So … when we’re little, we listen to the Big People (family, adults), mostly because we don’t know what else to do—and we kind of have to: They’re big, you know? And the Big People? They teach us pretty much everything. Along the way, of course, we get better at educating ourselves. We create and engage our sifting mechanism. Good from bad. Useful from useless. Sensible from nonsensical.
And later on, in school, we find some new Big People to listen to (teachers, coaches), but we also begin listening to one another. I remember going home and quoting things my friends had said as if those words had come from Aristotle or had descended from Mount Sinai with Moses.  (My parents were not generally all that impressed with my cafeteria and locker room wisdom.)
Years later, I realized that there actually were some Big People among my boyhood friends—the ones who somehow had wise hearts, a wonderful phrase I learned from my wife. Yes, I’d had friends whose young, wise hearts somehow knew what was kind, what was cruel, what was helpful, hurtful. Wrong. Keir Marticke was like that—a young woman with a wise heart.
Huck Finn was such a person too. Though when the novel first came out in the 1880s—and even much later—many adults were horrified by Huck’s rough ungrammatical language, his smoking, his truancy, his stealing (“borrowing,” he called it), his ragged clothing and the like—Horrible examples for children! But Huck’s wise heart has endured.

Sometimes, though (as we all know), the young can be a bit … slow … to begin their pursuit of wisdom? Sometimes (I'll use myself as an example) it’s because I thought I really got pretty much what was going on. I was thinking about this point a few weeks ago when I happened to see a newspaper cartoon—Zits. Do you know it? A cartoon about a high schooler named Jeremy—his family his friends, his girlfriend, Sara. Anyway, in the one I'm thinking of, Jeremy and his mom are sitting at the opposite ends of the couch. Both of them are thinking. Above her head it says This world is becoming such a complex and confusing place! And he’s thinking: I pretty much have everything figured out.
And have you noticed how commonly films show how, well, how immature young men can be? Those films most commonly are comedies, comedies that generally end with the young man moving toward a hard-won maturity. A decade ago, Judd Apatow made a fortune with that formula—The 40-Year-Old Virgin, Knocked Up, Superbad, and others. Films full of hilariously immature young men. More recently, there’s been 21 and 22 Jump Street. Horrible Bosses 1 and 2. You could probably name a score of others.
But things must have ever been thus, for that plot has been around for a long, long time. One of my favorite Shakespeare plays is Love’s Labour’s Lost (mid-1590s). (Gonna see it again next Friday!) It tells about the young King of Navarre (southwest France/northern Spain). The young King and three of his young buddies decide they will hang out in the King’s castle and focus on their studies, avoiding the company of women for three years. They swear a vow to one another. Then they sign it—with great ceremony. In fact, it’s the very first thing to happen in the play. Bros forever!
Well, no sooner have they done all this vowing and swearing and signing than a princess of France arrives (her entourage includes some beautiful followers and friends). She’s come to collect an old debt for her father. True to his oath, the King of Navarre forces the women to set up camp outside the castle.
But then—of course—the young men see these women, and, of course, all bets are off. And of course the young men don’t want their buddies to know what they’re up to, so, of course, they all go sneaking around to be with their latest passion. Later, realizing sheepishly that all of them have broken the vow, they join forces to invade the women’s camp. They disguise themselves as visiting Russians, dancing into the camp of the young women, who are not fooled a bit. But they play along for fun. Soon, they pair off, and it looks as if Love has arrived—as if it’s time for The Glitter Guy!
But at this moment of brightness—of hope—Shakespeare—sneaky, sneaky Will Shakespeare!—turns out the lights. A messenger arrives from France. The princess’ father, the French King, has died. The women quickly prepare to head for home. While the men urge them to marry first. And the women say, basically: Hey, you guys all broke your vows to one another—almost immediately! How can we possibly trust you? (Oh, snap!) The guys try to assure them (Hey, baby, come on now—chill!), but the women aren’t buying it. They say: Go away and help make the world a better place. Grow up. We’ll check in on you next year. Curtain!


Thursday, May 5, 2016

WRA Speech, Part 1 of 3

I've decided to post the text of the speech I gave at WRA on April 8. It was part of a lecture series named for Keir Marticke, a WRA student who graduated in 2002 and, tragically, died during a trip to Vietnam while she was in college. Her father and brother were in the audience.

Marticke Lecture
Western Reserve Academy
8 April 2016

Is Anybody Listening?
It’s an honor to be here today—just as it always has been. I stood here for the first time in the spring of 1980—that’s thirty-six years ago for those of you who (like me) are mathematically challenged—and I am grateful, once again, to have the privilege of … trembling … on the very spot where so many wonderful speakers have loosed upon you the wolfhounds of their language and ideas. (BTW—remember “wolfhounds”; later, you'll see why.)
I’d like, especially, to thank Ruth Andrews for inviting me today, to Abbey Baker for finalizing everything, to Sherry Chlysta for that generous introduction, to Jill Evans and her English II-ers with whom I just shared a great class, to Headmaster Burner, and, especially, to the Marticke family for sponsoring this annual event, an event that has become—in not all that many years—an important part of the life—the vigorous intellectual life—of Western Reserve Academy.
And it’s nice to see some of you students whom I know from the Open Door Coffee Company. Seeing you down there is one small way I stay in touch with Reserve, a place I’ve loved for a long, long time. As I said last year on this very spot, it gives me hope when I see you studying, caring. But … well … you could offer me some of your pastry? (My mommy taught me it’s polite to share! Just saying …)
Also nice to see some former colleagues—some of whom, once upon a time, were my students here: Mr. Ong (English III), Mrs. Bormann (English I). For years I’ve been blackmailing them both. (Mr. Ong, your April payment is late!)
And hello to Mr. Butensky-Bartlett, whose father, one of my great college friends, served as an usher at my wedding in December 1969. Some students told me they call you BB. Well, BB, I’m DD. Welcome to the Reserve Alphabet Club!
And hello, of course, to my wife, Joyce. She taught here from 1979–1990, the year our son graduated. I’m thrilled they’re here. Thrilled and safe. Why safe? Because … now… someone will have to tell me I did a good job! Oh, the lovely lies that lovers must tell!
I first came here to teach in the fall of 1979. I’d already taught a dozen years at the middle school over in Aurora—a wonderful place, by the way. And then, in 1977, having finished my Ph.D., I thought: I’m gonna be a professor! I applied for a lot of jobs. Got one. At Lake Forest College just up the lake from Chicago, and off I went with my family (our son had just turned six). I was going to begin my career as an Intellectual.
It didn’t work out.
You may find this hard to believe, but I missed middle school kids (I’d taught 7th graders, mostly). Missed their energy, their devotion. Their fundamental insanity. I needed me some more!
So after that single year at Lake Forest College I tried to get back to Aurora, but the middle school had no openings. So I applied a few other places in the area, including Reserve, which hired both my wife and me. As I said, she would stay till 1990 (you can see her picture over in Seymour), and I lasted exactly … two years. In 1989 I got in a little … kerfuffle about my salary, and—in a huff—I abruptly quit, worked some part-time jobs for a year, among them: teaching freshman English at Kent State and clerking down at The Learned Owl, owned at the time by your Headmaster’s parents.
In  the fall of 1982 I finally got back to Aurora and taught eighth graders there until my retirement in January 1997. Afterwards, I ran around for a few years, not unlike a released balloon—traveling, reading, writing, feeling almost delirious with the freedom to do what I wanted to.
Then, in April 2001 I was downtown having coffee at the old Saywell’s Drug Store (RIP) with good friend Tom Davis, the now-retired chair of the English Department here. He was sort of whimpering, “We have three openings in English for next year.”
I thought a minute (maybe less than a minute) and said, “How about two?”
And that less-than-a-minute of thought—no, impulse—led to one of the most enjoyable decades of my life—2001–2011. Back at Reserve after a twenty-year absence.
That first year, 2001–02, Keir Marticke was a senior here. Although I did have a few seniors that year in what they used to call “Senior Seminar,” Keir was not among them. But she was a presence on the campus, I can tell you that. I remember her in morning meetings and on campus; I remember thinking that she seemed … at peace with herself—not a common quality in the turbulence of youth. (My own, I’ll confess, was sometimes seismic; my mom, now 96, has still not forgotten—or forgiven—those quakes of mine that shook our house.)
If you look at Keir’s senior page in the 2002 Hardscrabble, you’ll see a line from a 1990s pop song by Ari DiFranco: If you’re born a lion, don’t bother trying to act tame. And then Keir's own words: Thanks to everyone who helped make it happen. She has ten pictures on her page, and eight of them show Keir with some of those who had helped make it happen.  
And so—again—I’m honored to speak at an event that bears Keir’s name.

Okay, a couple of stories now. Stories that will illustrate what I’m going to focus on this morning—well, insofar as I can focus on anything at my age!
Story One:
It was the fall of 1966. Aurora, Ohio. Aurora Middle School. I was in the very first weeks of my teaching career and was feeling very … professional. I was 21! A legal adult! I had a briefcase (a gift from my grateful parents—He's out of the house!)! I had a couple of neckties! I had an apartment! A car! A salary (on the first and the fifteenth of each month I got a fat paycheck—$168.42; I was rolling in it)! My seventh-grade students listened to me! (Well, sort of.)
One late afternoon in early fall I attended a district-wide teachers’ meeting. At one point, I leapt to my feet and uttered some very forgettable words about a topic I’ve also forgotten. But I do remember this: I was urgent; I was earnest, maybe even passionate. I sat down, very pleased with myself, with my first professional remarks. I was gonna change some things!
But immediately thereafter, one of the veteran elementary school teachers, an older woman (probably ten years younger than I am now), bellowed out in her playground voice: “Now, we can all ignore what that boy just said ….”
BOY! Did she say BOY? She went on, but I’ve suppressed the rest of it. Deeply suppressed it. But still—I’ve never forgotten that boy. I huffed and I puffed and wished I could blow her house down.
Story Two:
            Fast forward about fifty years. Last Father’s Day (2015) Joyce and I drove down to nearby Green, Ohio, to visit our son, daughter-in-law, and grandsons, Logan and Carson (10 and 6 at the time). It was a warm day, and just before we left their place, we started shooting hoops out in their driveway.
Now—for this part you're going to need some imagination: I’d been a pretty decent basketball player, back in my high school days.  FYI—my senior year, 1962, I was on the county all-star team. No need to stand and applaud. It wasn’t all that great an honor. Back then, Portage County was full of small schools with small players with small talent.
Anyway, after a few minutes in our son’s driveway, the Old Rhythm came back, and I was sinking shots with shocking regularity. I was In the Zone! Logan—the ten-year-old, and a very good player—was stunned (he’d never really seen me shoot before), and when he came over to guard me, I whipped a long behind-the-back pass to my son. Chest-high. Perfect.
Logan stopped and sighed, deeply.
“What’s wrong?” I asked.
And he said these immortal words: “Old guys aren’t supposed to be any good.” He was smiling, kidding, ironic, I knew. So I laughed.

Okay, what these two little stories show, I hope, is a simple and sometimes painful truth: People don’t really listen to you much when you’re young; they don’t listen to you much when you’re old. So you have a few decades, if you’re lucky, when people will consider you neither an infant/child/adolescent/BOY—or a dotard. And maybe—just maybe—listen a little.
(Okay—pause for an English-teachery word, dotage, one I always put on my English III vocab list: a state or period of senile decay marked by decline of mental poise and alertness. A dotard is someone in that period.)
Oh, and there’s a similar word like dotage for younonage: a period of youth.
So—between our nonage and our dotage—it’s possible that people will actually listen to us. Or not. (No guarantees.) So I guess the next question is When that time arrives, what are you going to say? And how? … We’ll come back to that.

But first, let’s take a quick look at these two extremes—nonage, dotage. When you’re young, it’s often true, isn’t it, that  no one’s really listening?  Oh, sure, when you’re a wee one, people will ask you if you want some juice—will ask you about kindergarten and your pet—or if you have to go p-p—but here are some questions I’m guessing none of you ever heard directed your way in early childhood: What do you think about our reliance on fossil fuels? Or: In Macbeth, what would be the metaphorical significance of having the three witches remain on stage the whole time? You get the picture …
The same thing happens when you’re much older. Let’s use my dad, for example. Edward Dyer. Now, you’ll need just a little background for this story to sink in as deeply as I want it to. Born in 1913, Dad grew up on an Oregon farm, the second oldest of eleven kids. When he was about your age, his own father died. So during the Great Depression he went to work to help support the family. But he also began college, worked his way through. Eventually earned a bachelor’s, two master’s degrees. Got married in 1939, began his career as a preacher. Then … December 7, 1941 … Pearl Harbor. He joined the Army, became a chaplain, earned a Bronze Star for bravery, served both in the South Pacific and in Europe. Back home after the War, he earned his Ph.D. at the University of Oklahoma, switched his profession to Teacher Education. Then came the Korean War in the early 1950s. Called back to active duty, he was stationed for two years at Amarillo Air Force Base in Texas. When that war ended, he returned to university teaching and ended his career out at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, as an associate dean of the graduate school. He and Mom retired out on the Oregon coast; then health problems felled him, so they moved to Massachusetts, near my two brothers. Dad died in November 1999. I miss him every single day. When I taught here, I wore his academic gown every year at Commencement.
Now, here’s what I’m getting at … when I would go out to Massachusetts to visit him in his assisted-living unit, and, later, in the nursing home, some of his caretakers would talk to him like this: Hi, Ed! How’s your pudding today? That sort of thing. All of his history—his magnificent history (farm, Depression, World War II, graduate degrees)—was either unknown or forgotten or irrelevant. He was a toddler again, in many of his caretakers’ eyes, an attitude expressed not just with words but with tone of voice … how’s your pudding today?
Let’s invite Mr. Shakespeare to comment here … he always seems to have something to say—though we can’t always understand it, can we? Of course, if he were to materialize this afternoon down at Open Door and sit with some of you, he wouldn’t be able to understand a thing you were talking about—or a thing that he saw or experienced. (Except tables, chairs, and the like.) Your clothes, haircuts, smart phones (What are your thumbs doing?); your food, your drinks—even your smells—would baffle him. (And how's that music coming out of the ceiling?) In order for him to communicate with you (which, surely, he wants to do—otherwise, what’s he doing at Open Door—looking for the Bachelorette?), he would have to learn your vocabulary, your culture—would have to catch up on world history since 1616, the year he died. And, likewise, if we want to understand him, we have to grant him the same courtesy. Not always easy, I’ll grant you. But worth it.
Okay … keeping it a hundred. When I read Shakespeare in high school—Julius Caesar my sophomore year, Macbeth my senior—I hated every second of it. I just could not get it, and at that point in my life, I figured if I couldn’t get it—right away—well, it obviously wasn’t worth getting. Take this little speech from Caesar, delivered by Brutus:
BRUTUS: Swear priests and cowards, and men cautelous,
Old feeble carrions, and such suffering souls
That welcome wrongs: unto bad causes swear
Such creatures as men doubt.  (2.1)

What the—? Reading that in tenth grade, I realized I despised Shakespeare. Always would.
Then things changed. Much of that change is Reserve’s fault. When I came to teach here in 1979, English I (which I taught) included … Julius Caesar (NO!) and English III (which I also taught), Hamlet (IMP0SSIBLE!). So … not wanting to look like a dolt in front of my students, I started to work on Shakespeare—and I’ve never stopped. Joyce and I have seen every single one of his three dozen plays onstage (some of them many times); I’ve visited his birthplace, read all the plays and sonnets and other poems multiple times, memorized lots of his lines, read many biographies …. I’ve stood by his grave at Holy Trinity Church in Stratford-upon-Avon.
And speaking of that grave … the 400th anniversary of Shakespeare’s death is very near—on April 23rd. You may have heard the news that the church recently granted permission to some researchers to conduct a sophisticated radar scan of the grave. And one of their first discoveries: His skull appears to be missing! Purportedly taken by souvenir hunters in the late 1700s. And just last week I read that one of the supposed head-snatchers was named Dyer! I don't know whether to be ashamed or proud?!?

To be continued ...


Wednesday, May 4, 2016

May 4, 1970 (re-post)

On previous years, I've posted this piece about the experiences Joyce and I had on May 4, 1970.  Here it is again, lightly edited.




In May 1970, Joyce and I had been married just four months. I was teaching full time at the old Aurora Middle School (102 E. Garfield Road) and was taking graduate courses at Kent State University at night. Joyce was a full-time grad student at Kent, working toward her master's in English. Although both of us were strongly opposed to the Vietnam War, we were not involved in any of the demonstrations. It was safe for me to oppose the war: After all, I had a teacher's deferment and would soon turn 26--the cut-off age for the draft. I do not recall that attitude with pride--but it was how I felt at the time. Both Joyce and I had grown up with many family members who'd been in World War II--and my dad stayed in the Air Force Reserves, retiring as a Lt. Col. So it was not military personnel whom we opposed (we loved our parents, aunts and uncles); it was the war in Southeast Asia.

We were living in our first apartment (in a four-flat building at 323 College Court), just a couple of blocks west of the campus (see the red marker in the photo), and we both routinely walked to our classes--and to the library. Son Steve was more than two years in the future.

There had been lots of protesting in the streets in recent days; police and fire sirens sang our lullabies each night. Searchlights were our nightlights.

On Monday morning, May 4, I drove to school in Aurora (a little over twelve miles due north), knowing that Joyce had planned to be up on campus for the day for classes and then for some research in the library.

I was in our teachers' lounge when I heard the first news of the shootings: Someone came in and said he'd heard that several National Guardsmen had been shot on the campus.  (That was the first story we heard--soldiers shot, not students.)  But when the actual news came through a bit later, I was alarmed.  Four students ... shot and killed. Others wounded.

I tried to call home, but everyone else on earth was trying to call Kent also. Nothing but a busy signal. And computers and cell phones lay far in the future.

I went to see my principal, Mike Lenzo, and told him I had to get home to find out if Joyce was all right. He quickly agreed (I don't remember who took my afternoon classes), and I headed for Kent, south on Rte. 43.  But when I got to Streetsboro (about halfway to Kent), I saw that the Highway Patrol was blocking 43--no access there to any points south (meaning: Kent).  Although I was frightened, I'd grown up in Portage County, so I took some back roads I knew and got to our apartment without any other problems.

And Joyce was there. The relief I felt I cannot to this day express.

Joyce told me that a student had run into the library while she was there. They're killing us! he'd cried.  They're killing us! His hands were bloody.

We decided we would not stay in town.  Helicopters were hovering overhead; armed soldiers were in the streets of Kent. We had no idea what the night might bring. Mike had told me we could stay with them, so we packed a few things and headed for the Lenzos' home in Twin Lakes, a few miles north of town. We stayed there a couple of nights.

Our only frightening moment: As we were driving out of town on Depeyster (see map) we were stopped at the Main Street intersection. (Yellow star marks our position.)  To our left--what was then a rooming house (now a BW3); to our right, the parking lot of the Firestone store. In the Firestone lot was a National Guard Jeep with a heavy machine gun mounted on the back. Two soldiers.

As we sat there at the red light, a student leaned out of an upper window of the rooming house and yelled, Fuck all you murdering pigs!

We looked at the soldiers, who swiftly swung the machine gun our way.

I ran the red light.

In a few days, back in our home, we walked the streets of Kent and marveled. All the driveways to the university were blocked by armed Guardsmen. Downtown, I took a picture of a store window. It bore a large message: Happy Mother's Day!  But the reflection showed an armored military vehicle passing by. (I can't find that old photo now--will look more assiduously later.)  Mother's Day was on May 10 that year.

We had to finish our courses by snail-mail.  (No faxes in those days; no email.)

So ... we were not directly involved.  No one shot at us.  We had a very dear friend who was involved that year, though. Harry Vincent, from Garrettsville (I'd played on baseball teams with him, had been in college with him and his older brother, Jim), had to hit the ground when the bullets flew.

Both Joyce and I, though--and millions of other Americans--were wondering what was happening to the country we had grown up in.  JFK, 1963.  MLK, 1968.  RFK, 1968.  KSU, 1970. Jackson State, 1970.  It was a horrifying time of blood and loss, of dreams shattered by gunfire, while a country lost its moorings and drifted toward madness.