Dawn Reader

Dawn Reader
from Open Door Coffee Co.; Hudson, OH; Oct. 26, 2016

Monday, September 16, 2013

Spoon River Middle School: 53

Perm Addle


Free Writing

I don’t like what’s been happening to me this year.  And not happening.  And not happening fast enough.
Let’s start with my voice.  Just last year I was still getting picked in music class to sing solos at programs and assemblies.  Remember?  Then, over the summer, that voice was gone, practically overnight.  I noticed it at church.  One Sunday I was singing along just fine, usual soprano, people around me smiling, probably thinking That kid has a nice voice!
A week later?  I can’t sing any of the high notes.  The low ones sound raspy, and broken.  Summer cold?  Next week it’s worse.  No summer cold.  No more soprano voice.  No more smiling adults around me in church.  No more solos.
And then … my skin.  Stuff popping out.  Overnight in some cases.  My nose is clear when I go to bed, dotted with red and white and black when I look in the mirror the next morning.  Nice.
Lately, too, whenever I even think about a girl I like—or look at one—or smell their perfume—well, let’s just say I want to wait a bit before I stand up.  Thinking about liver and onions sometimes helps.  Or mushrooms.  (I hate both.)  But sometimes nothing helps.  Except a jacket I hold in front of me as I walk—quickly—down the hall.
Some of my short friends are tall friends now.  Some of them are very tall friends.  It was kind of funny, watching that happen so fast.  One day, it seemed, their pants fit.  The next day, you could see a foot of their socks between their shoes and the bottom of their pants.  I thought it was funny.  Until I noticed it wasn’t happening to me.  My pants from seventh grade were still fitting in the eighth.  I didn’t like that.  Especially since I want to be at least six feet tall, don’t ask me why.  I’m not sure.  It’s just what I want.
And in the shower—after gym class?—I’ve noticed that some guys (most guys?) are looking more like … well, like guys.  Hair, hair—everywhere.  Some of them, Mr. Stratford, are shaving after gym.  I don’t think they really need to—but they can.  And so they do.  Standing over there, hogging the sinks, wiping white cream all over their faces, scraping away as if they’ve been doing it all their lives.  While I and a few other smoothies—that’s the name for us now, smoothies, there are other words for us, too, but I’m not going to write them here just in case, you know, you decide to change your policy about how honest we can be, about how we can write about anything—stand there looking like little kids, like naked third graders who wandered into the wrong room.
Short version of what I want.  (1) To have a decent singing voice again. (2) To have a body that doesn’t go all … rebellious … when I’m around a girl I like.  (3) To grow to be six feet—or a little more (nothing too gianty).  (4) To grow hair where it ought to be growing—but not so much that I look like my uncle Darrell, who has so much curly hair all over him that if he fell over backwards he would bounce right back up.
Is that too much to ask?


Sunday, September 15, 2013

The Bard in Our Brave (?) New World



I read recently that Shakespeare is the only writer mentioned specifically in the Common Core Standards (CCS), the latest attempt by the we-can-measure-it crowd to trivialize education.  I guess that's true about Shakespeare, though--I just looked at the CCS online site and found this (for 11th and 12th graders--the underlining is mine):
  • CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RL.11-12.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone, including words with multiple meanings or language that is particularly fresh, engaging, or beautiful. (Include Shakespeare as well as other authors.)
And under "Integration of Knowledge and Ideas" is this:
  • CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RL.11-12.7 Analyze multiple interpretations of a story, drama, or poem (e.g., recorded or live production of a play or recorded novel or poetry), evaluating how each version interprets the source text. (Include at least one play by Shakespeare and one play by an American dramatist.)
This stuff makes me crazy.  As we charge into our Not-So-Brave New World of tests-and-measurements, we reduce literature to this sort of nonsense--trying to reduce everything to something we can measure.  It seems odd that our fear of weak teachers is leading us to construct "teacher-proof" curricula that make it hard for teachers to be anything but weak.  For--as I've written ad nauseum--minimum standards invariably become the maximum curriculum--especially when tests measure only what appears in those minimum standards.  Teachers who dare to carry on in class about things not on the tests do so at their own peril.

Have I told this before?  Here it is again.  Not long before I retired from public education (January 1997), one of my eighth graders asked me one day (I was going over something weird--a writer, an event or something--can't remember), "Is this going to be on the Proficiency Test?"  I said I very much doubted it.  He asked (without any rancor--just wondering), "Then why are we talking about it?"

Indeed.

Let me rant, just a little, about Shakespeare.  First of all, no one ever went to a Shakespeare play to improve his or her vocabulary.  (Oh, sure, someone probably did--just keep things in perspective!)  For more than 400 years people have gone to the plays to be both entertained and edified--to learn some things about human ambition, about love and cruelty (sometimes they're the same), about the capacities of the human heart.  How would you like to emerge from a production and have to take a standardized test on some very limited objectives?  Well, that's what we're asking kids to do.  Only it's often not a production they've seen; it's a text they've "read"--or snippets they've seen (or heard) of "important" moments in a play.  We insist so often on treating the plays as if they were words on a page instead of lives on a stage.

Second, does it really not matter which Shakespeare play we use?  The CCS seems to think so.  So, instead of, oh, Hamlet or Twelfth Night or Othello or Macbeth, I could use King John and Pericles, Prince of Tyre?  Really?  Sure, those latter two plays have some interest, but don't we want our kids reading/seeing/discussing the best of the Bard?  The plays whose characters and lines and messages are everywhere in our culture?  Because part of knowing Shakespeare, of course, is recognizing allusions to his work that are, well, everywhere--from Bugs Bunny to Ulysses.  I haven't seen a lot for, oh, The Two Noble Kinsmen.

Yes, Shakespeare can be difficult.  But a teacher's job is to help students enter his 400-year-old world.  As I've said before, he would be even more lost in our world than we can be in his.  If he were to sit down in a Starbucks for a few hours, he would not really understand anything he was seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting.  So, we help students find ways into his plays (I'll be blogging more about this a little later), where they can be puzzled, sure (who isn't?), but where they can also be moved, dazzled, entertained, and edified beyond any expectations.

The Bard's vocabulary is different from ours--but sometimes it plain doesn't matter.  Take this passage from The Taming of the Shrew--a passage I might have posted before (tough teabags).  A servant is describing the arrival of Petruchio, the groom, at his wedding.  He is dressed weirdly, mounted on an odd horse.  But look at the language!

BIONDELLO
Why, Petruchio is coming in a new hat and an old
jerkin, a pair of old breeches thrice turned, a pair
of boots that have been candle-cases, one buckled,
another laced, an old rusty sword ta'en out of the
town-armory, with a broken hilt, and chapeless;
with two broken points: his horse hipped with an
old mothy saddle and stirrups of no kindred;
besides, possessed with the glanders and like to mose
in the chine; troubled with the lampass, infected
with the fashions, full of wingdalls, sped with
spavins, rayed with yellows, past cure of the fives,
stark spoiled with the staggers, begnawn with the
bots, swayed in the back and shoulder-shotten;
near-legged before and with, a half-chequed bit
and a head-stall of sheeps leather which, being
restrained to keep him from stumbling, hath been
often burst and now repaired with knots; one girth
six time pieced and a woman's crupper of velure,
which hath two letters for her name fairly set down
in studs, and here and there pieced with packthread.
BAPTISTA
Who comes with him?
BIONDELLO
O, sir, his lackey, for all the world caparisoned
like the horse; with a linen stock on one leg and a
kersey boot-hose on the other, gartered with a red
and blue list; an old hat and 'the humour of forty
fancies' pricked in't for a feather: a monster, a
very monster in apparel, and not like a Christian
footboy or a gentleman's lackey.
I don't know too many people who can read that and understand the details.  I know the first time I read it, my eyes were hopping around (up and down from text to footnotes) like a cat on a hot tin roof.  So what would the CCS advise us to do here?  Pass out a vocab list.  Teach the meanings of the words crupper and mose in the chine.  Give a test?  And does it matter if we understand every word of this?

 I guess one of the aspects of the arts--including literature--is that the effects on people are widely variable, definitely difficult (impossible?) to measure, and sometimes greatly delayed: the effects, in other words, may show up later, down the road, when you least expect anything.

And I believe profoundly that young people should read a lot in school--for fun, for edification.  They should read enduring things, evanescent things, things in between.  And they should read them because important literary works, in some ways, are like viruses.  They lie in your mind--sometimes for years--before their effects become evident.

Another comparison--maybe, a night-blooming cereus--that gorgeous plant that blooms only once a year, a single night.  (Check out this time-lapse photography on YouTube: Link).  An idea, an image, in a literary work can do that.  Lie quietly in you.  Then blossom.  And change you forever with surprise, and beauty.

Test on Friday.


Saturday, September 14, 2013

Boys Lie

I saw this bumper sticker the other day in a Hudson parking lot.  In one way, it struck me as kind of self-evident, like grass is green and pizza tastes good.  But I thought it might refer to something specific I didn't know about, so I Googled the term--and, sure enough, found the lyrics to a 2012 Cheryl Cole song ("Boys Lie"); I listened to it on YouTube and felt bad about myself.  "Boys lie, and somewhere / A good girl cries, cries, cries ...."  She hits that refrain several times in the song.  By the end, I was feeling really, really bad about myself.  (Link to song.)

Because, you see ... I'm a boy.  I've lied.  Q.E.D.

My lies began early--when I figured out, as a wee lad, that I could sometimes get and/or do what I wanted if I, you know, lied.  An example: In Enid, Oklahoma, where we lived during most of my boyhood, my parents had a charge account at the local J & J Grocery.  Charging things dazzled me--seeing my mom or dad just sign for something.  No money.  (The notion that they would pay later had not dawned on me.)  So ... J & J had really great fresh glazed donuts.  One summer I started going in every day and charging one--or two--or more.  (Sometimes my friends benefited from my largess.)  Mr. Jones (yep, his name--no lie) would invariably ask me: "Is this okay with your parents?"

"Sure."

Lie.

Well, here came the end of the month.  The donuts were "only" five cents each (you can always say "only" when it's not your money), but multiplied over an entire month, the final figure was impressive--something like $5.  (Remember: This was the day when 5 cents got you a Coke in a machine, a full-sized Snickers bar, etc.) That month I learned not only about charge accounts but also about the consequences of abusing them.  Dad garnisheed my allowance--though I didn't learn that word for a long time.

And then there was my lie about being related to Daniel Boone (the "Daniel" part, of course).  And another one about being pen pals with Annette Funicello (a Mouseketeer, for you who are chronologically challenged).  And a small scar on my knee coming from that time I, you know, nearly cut my whole leg off ...  The usual boyhood nonsense that probably no one believed anyhow.
The lies, of course, darkened as I grew older and discovered ways to use words to deceive family, friends, teachers.  Oh, nothing ever too egregious.  My parents, by the way, almost always caught me.  More consequences ensued.

In high school (and college, too, I fear) I did hurt girls with my lies. Boys--adolescents--older?--tend to bow down before the Great God Testosterone and rise to obey his commandments.  It's a sad truth, rooted as it is in that evolutionary imperative.  And then there's that Biblical imperative, too: Go forth and multiply.  I often (always?) hated myself when I lied to girls.  Mostly later, though.  After I'd damaged hearts and smudged my own soul.  

Of course, boys have no monopoly on lying.  Girls lied to me, too--and I almost always believed them.  (Are liars always themselves extremely credulous?)  But, somehow, in my own head, those girls' lies (wee as they were) failed to cancel in my own conscience the whoppers I had told.  My guilt I carried around in my mind--an over-sized bowling ball in a small bag.  And I learned a wrenching equation: lies received do not cancel lies told.

Of course, adolescents have no monopoly on lying (there's that term perjury, you know).  Now an official Senior Citizen (I'm on Medicare!), I know that pretty much everyone lies.  Sometimes, we know, it's just harmless (?) social convention.  I love your dress.  Your granddaughter is so cute.  I loved your speech.  This is the best linguine I've had in a long time.  What a great dog you have!

I mean, all that's preferable and more socially lubricating, say, than Your dress is hideous.  Your granddaughter should wear a mask.  Your speech was juvenile.  Your linguine gave me stomach cramps.  Your dog needs to be put down.

Did you see that 2009 film The Invention of Lying?  Ricky Gervais and Jennifer Garner and Louis C. K. and Jonah Hill and others in an alternative world that knows no lying.  Until Ricky blurts one out, and everyone believes it.  The world world begins to change forever.  
I've been hurt by lies, too.  From both genders.  All ages.  When I was teaching, students lied to me all the time--from small ones (I left it in my locker) to larger ones (I was sick last night) to whoppers (I love your class, Dr. Dyer!).  My colleagues lied to me--my bosses.  I remember when the Aurora teachers' union was having a negotiating training session with the school superintendent, a session conducted by a consultant and designed to introduce a novelty into negotiating: truth-telling.  During one of the role-playing exercises, I, well, told the truth, revealing a (imaginary) union position.  The superintendent scoffed and said, "I hope you're on the bargaining team!"  So much for honesty!

And one of the reasons we have so many government regulations?  People lie--all the time.  Think of health care.  Patients lie.  Doctors lie to the insurance companies.  Drug companies lie.  Insurance companies lie.  Hospitals lie.  

The worst lies, of course, are those designed to deceive people who trust you most and, simultaneously, to improve your own position vis-a-vis whatever.  Think former Rep. Weiner.  Or South Carolina's Mark Sanford, who was definitely on a trail--just not one in Appalachia.  Or think about just any politician who willfully distorts an opponent's position or blatantly lies about what that person has done--or believes in.  When our son was running for office, it was horrible to watch his opponent's TV ads, which blamed Steve, it seemed, for everything from the world financial crisis to the Civil War to the disappearance of the passenger pigeon.

There's no real way to prevent lying.  We all do it, don't we?  My mom, 94, always the Guardian of the Truth in our household, is telling whoppers these days.  ("They never came to get me for my hair appointment"; yes, they did; she told them to go away.)  Oh, and my favorite lie my mom told a few years ago when she was still driving--but nearing the end.  She'd had an accident--totaled her car (a tree, not someone else--she wore a neck brace afterward for a while).  She called both my brother Dave and me and wondered if she ought to get a new car.  We both sort of shuffled around the question, implying/hinting that maybe her driving days ought to be over.  Meanwhile, she had a new car already sitting in her garage at the moment she was calling us.  Ah, Mom!

Anyway, blatant, unrelieved truth-telling (see The Invention of Lying) creates too much of a social discomfort--for everyone.  And lying--curse its soul--just plain works much of the time--until it doesn't.  At which time we, the deceived, feel horrible--and maybe compose song lyrics.  Bitter ones.  And the liar swears that he/she is so sorry--but, as we know (liars that we are), we're sorry principally because we've been caught.

Friday, September 13, 2013

Spoon River Middle School: 52


Abby West


Free Writing (A Country Song)

My daddy hit me with his belt.
My mom was always drunk.
My brother always beat me up.
My sister?  She went punk.

My uncle groped me in the hall
And said it felt real fine,
And Cousin Larry showed me his,
Then said I must show mine.

Chorus:
            So don’t go singing all about
            How childhood is so free,
            And don’t you ever treat me, boy,
            Like I am fam-i-ly.

An uncle frenched me when he saw
That I was growing breasts.
He’s always staring at my butt—
Can’t think of what comes next.

Another cousin held me down
And poured beer over me.
My aunt just watched and laughed so hard
She said she nearly peed.

            Chorus.

My grandma gave me cigarettes
When I was only 8.
Then Grandpa smiled his yellow smile,
Said pot was also great.

And Uncle Tyler, high on meth,
He grabbed my curly head
And told me I should wait for him—
He’d see me soon—in bed.

            Chorus

So now I’m in a foster home—
Where no one bothers me.
And now I’m in a different school—
At last I’m breathing free.


            Chorus

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Keeping It to Myself



Although I occasionally write here about my health, I am not comfortable doing so.  Far from it.  When I was growing up, my parents were highly reserved--especially about corporal matters.  One of my earliest memories--from the mid-1950s--is being awakened in the night by the flashing lights of an ambulance.  My father had suffered a severe kidney stone attack, and the ambulance whisked him off to St. Mary's Hospital in Enid, Okla., the hospital where my younger brother and I were born.  Grandma--who lived just a couple of blocks away from us--came to stay with us three boys while Mom went to the hospital with Dad.  I was terrified?  Did I sleep that night?  Will my father come home again?

Dad had undergone kidney surgery before, during World War II--out in the South Pacific--and he bore a scar that traveled halfway round the equator of his midsection--belly button to spine (it looked--as I think about it now--like the sort of stitches we associate with the head of Frankenstein's creature).  And when he came home from St. Mary's in a few days, he had another one, on the other side.  His stitches now circled his globe.  It took him awhile to get up and going again--and a very fond memory is this: Dad in his bathrobe, out behind the house with me, trying to toss a baseball back and forth.  I was 10, maybe.  And grieving for my father, who could barely toss the ball six feet--my father, a splendid athlete, high school and college football and track and baseball star.  He could run, as they say, like a scalded cat.  More appropriate for Okla.: like a cyclone.  (He'd broken 10 seconds in the 100-yd. dash in high school.  My brothers and I, sadly, inherited the speed of my mother.)

Anyway, my parents did not talk about their medical issues (my mom, 94, still doesn't)--and taught us to suffer in silence, as well.  To them, there was something unseemly about public declarations of just about any sort.  Be modest.  Let your actions speak for themselves.  That sort of thing.  (Cassius Clay/Muhammad Ali bothered my dad enormously.)

Another memory to illustrate ...  In the early 1980s son Steve and I flew out to Portland, Ore, then drove west to Cannon Beach, where my parents had recently retired and built their modest retirement home on a cliff overlooking the Pacific--stunning views of Haystack Rock and the mountains off in the other direction.  We were seated one night at the dinner table (from which we could see the ocean, the mountains), when Mom went downstairs (they had a little visitors' apartment there) to the freezer to retrieve some ice cream treats for dessert.  She apparently banged her ankle/foot horribly down there on an open drawer (or something), and even though she was in terrific pain, she filled the platter with the desserts, and, dragging her lame leg behind her, struggled up the stairs and staggered over to the table.  Everyone cried aloud ("What's wrong?!?!" etc.), but Mom got that platter to the table, slumped into her chair, PAIN written in a huge red font on her face.  "I'm all right," she smiled, tears running down her cheeks, wetly announcing her lie.

My parents never wanted their three sons to be public about their ills, either.  We kept pain to ourselves, illnesses.  In seventh grade one day, I felt horrible.  Said nothing.  Shared my illness by vomiting all over the floor in geography class.

That's my family history, you see.

So when I started this blog, I didn't write much about corporal matters--and when I did, I did so with irony and self-deprecation (my mother still would not have approved, believe me).  But as my story darkened a little, so did my prose (and so did some of the "Daily Doggerels" I posted on Facebook).

I generally write these posts the night before.  Let them simmer.  Do some slight revision(s) in the morning.  And every time--every single time--I write about my prostate cancer, I plan to delete the post when I come down in the morning.  But then I force myself to upload it.

I know that these posts bother some people (some have said so--in ways direct and indirect), and I'm sorry they feel that way.  But I understand.  (I might even have agreed with them, at another time.)

But I figure: I'm not forcing anyone to read them.  The title says what's on the menu, so a reader can always dine at another restaurant that day.

And besides: I'm not really writing these pieces for anyone else--or for sympathy. (That would be sad.)  No, they're for me.  I find that words can--temporarily?--confine pain and terror and anxiety in a web of words.  Especially public words.  (I'm not sure why.)  And I think: If I can just keep all this horror locked inside a sentence, maybe it won't get out.  Not for a while, anyhow.

For, you see, I am afraid these days.  Afraid to lose all that I care about--family, books, the blank page, friends, exercise, mobility, the softened sunlight that, as I type these words, is illuminating the thick trunk of a linden right outside my study window, the grey squirrel across the street, poised, making a decision (moments later he's in our bird bath, drinking in the sunset), the mess in my study, my sourdough bread, going to Stratford--sitting in the dark, watching Shakespeare come alive in the light, the Great Lakes Theater Festival, a good movie--a bad one, my bicycle, Kindle, Hattie's Cafe, Panera (on Sunday morning), Facebook, Daily Doggerel, Starbucks, Kirkus Reviews, the Plain Dealer, the New York Times Book Review, the New York Review of Books, DawnReader, memories of a key base hit, a crucial foul shot, a wicked backhand, our old dog Sooner, the Chilkoot Pass, an appearance on the Hiram High School stage, directing The 8th Grade Farewell-to-Harmon Show, playing Frisbee with Harmon students out at lunch, laughing in class with my students, losing weight (gaining it back), making my grandmother's steamed pudding at Christmas--and the sweet bread shaped like a Christmas tree, memorizing poems, reciting "A Visit from St. Nicholas" for my grandsons, chicken I've grilled outside--and salmon--sourdough pizza crust and muffins, peaches and maple syrup from Monroe's farm in Hiram, my memories of my great-grandfather, my grandparents, my aunts and uncles and cousins, car trips to distant places to see literary sites--yes, and the graves of writers, the houses we've lived in (Kent, Lake Forest, Hudson, Aurora, Hudson again), my teachers (Mrs. Rockwell, Mr. Brunelle, Mrs. Dreisbach, Dr. Ravitz, Dr. McKinley, Dr. Marovitz--and so many others), my mentors and colleagues, Adams Elementary School (in Enid), the Hiram Local Schools, Hiram College, Harmon Middle School, Western Reserve Academy, the thousands of students who sat, hopeful, in my classroom, the books I haven't read, haven't written, my brothers' laughs, my niece's and nephew's kindnesses, my daughter-in-law's devotion, my sister-in-law's candor, my grandsons' energy, my son's soft heart and eyes that redden with emotion ...

... and Joyce.

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Spoon River Middle School: 51


Melanie Fly


Free Writing

Dear Mr. Stratford,

Did you tell?  ’Cause, you see, that night I ran off?  My friend’s parents came right downstairs not long after I heard the phone ring, which they never do (come downstairs—I told you that), and found me hiding behind the bed.  (I heard them coming.)
Why did they come down there?
I bet you told, didn’t you?
I thought you said we could trust you!
Can we?

Billy Kidd


Note to Buddy Charles found on the floor near desk

That new girl—that Abby West?  You seen her yet?  I reckon I’m really glad she’s grazing here in our pasture now.


P.S.—Stay away from her, pardner.  I ain’t kidding.

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Post 602: At University Hospitals ...


I just realized I forgot to mention blog post #600 when I uploaded it a couple of days ago.  It was, appropriately, the one about my mom's 94th birthday, which the family celebrated with her over the weekend--though her actual birthday was just yesterday, the 9th.  So ... this is #602, and on and on and on we go.  Who would have thought so many words were hiding in me, seeking escape?

Yesterday (Mom's birthday), I had a session with my oncologist up at the Seidman Cancer Center at University Hospitals in Chagrin.  But first ... a quick summary of my history with prostate cancer--for anyone new to the site.  If you know about my situation, you can skip the next paragraph--italicized for sake of convenience.

Late in 2004, I was diagnosed with prostate cancer.  The biopsy indicated a mid-range cancer, so no one was too worried.  I elected surgical removal (prostatectomy), which a Cleveland Clinic surgeon performed in June 2005.  The post-op pathology indicated a cancer far more serious than the biopsy had indicated--and also revealed that some of the cells had escaped the gland and were on the loose.  I waited until my PSA became evident again (it was undetectable for a while after the surgery) and then underwent 35 daily radiation treatments--again, at the Cleveland Clinic, early in 2009.  But my PSA, which fell dramatically after the radiation, began climbing again, and when it reached 22.9, my Clinic oncologist recommended I commence hormone therapy--a treatment, not a cure.  At that time, I switched to University Hospitals (for a variety of reasons--convenience a major one), where I began oral meds (Bicaludamide) on July 16, 2013 (ironically, our son's birthday) and received my first injection of Lupron (I'll do so every three months until it stops working) on 26 August.  My most recent blood work showed that my PSA had fallen to 0.59  And my other numbers on other tests were also good.  Yesterday, I met with my oncologist at UH ...

My oncologist had already phoned with my test results--so I was not worried about them.  The numbers were good--encouraging even.  But I knew, too, that my pathology placed me outside the norm, so I was both eager and worried about the discussion that would ensue.  I also has several Lupron side-effects to report:

  • Declining libido.  Not a surprise--not when the entire intent of Lupron is to kill testosterone, the food of prostate cancer cells.  Still ... discouraging, depressing.
  • Digestive issues.  Rather than venture into TMI Territory, let's just say that I have found that some sugar-free butterscotch hard candy often resolves the issues.
  • Sleep habits.  This is actually a good one: I find that although I still wake up several times a night for my customary nocturnal inspections of the restroom (you never know what's been going on in there), during the periods I am asleep I am deep asleep--more so than I've been in years.  On Sunday night I was so fast asleep that I woke up in an odd position with no memory of having assumed it.  I mean, I was lying across that bed in a weird configuration, so weird that Joyce (startled?) had fled to the back bedroom for the remainder of the night.
  • Body heat.  I had read that one of the most common side effects of Lupron is the hot flash.  I don't know what I expected--a microwavy effect?  But what I'm experiencing--oh, a dozen times a day (including the night)--is not so much a flash as a suffusion.  I gradually become aware that I am hotter that I ought to be, given the ambient temperature, the activity.  I perspire--sometimes heavily.  These periods do not last long; they are not debilitating.  They're just, as I said, a suffusion of heat--a filling of a sponge--somewhat like the arrival of shame.
Dr. H. (let's call him that--since oncologist gets a bit tiresome to type) is a warm, supportive man (as well as being highly knowledgeable); he listens, asks questions whose answers seem genuinely to interest him.  He has a heart.  No question.  He told me that he was glad to see the big drop in my PSA (for some men the drug does not work at all) and reminded me that Lupron's average period of effectiveness is 18-24 months.  That's the average.  And we all know what that means: Some men go much longer, some much shorter, before the cancer returns.  With my pathology, it's likely that it will be a shorter time.

And when that happens?

He told us there are some new clinical trials available--including a drug that attempts to target the cancer cells themselves.  That's hopeful.

I made some subsequent appointments for tests, for consultations, for injections.  It's all kind of complicated, seeing everyone I need to see at the times I need to see them.

I confess I've felt sort of "down" since I got home Monday noon.  It's sobering to hear "18 to 24 months" directed to you.  Dr. H. was not discouraging: He was happy with my numbers, happy to hear about my strict diet (I eat the way you're supposed to), my general lifestyle (no smoking or drinking or drugs), my daily exercise. He emphasized that I've done well since 2005--a sign that my body has been doing an effective job fighting off the cancer.  So we'll see ... the damn stuff does keep coming back ...

Meanwhile, I will navigate my way through this fog, looking for lighter sky, for signs of the sun.  I will throw myself, as always, into my reading, my writing--and, best of all, into the arms of that gorgeous soul who holds my hand in the darkness, squeezes tightly, always, just when I feel I can no longer see my way.